Аналіз

Перевірити твердження

Архітектура бази джерел для зв'язку тверджень із джерелами, рівнів упевненості, обмежень і виправлень.

Деякі записи, графіки й робочі процеси можуть залишатися чернетками або заповнювачами до перевірки.

Перевірені матеріали

Що показують поточні джерела

Ці картки коротко переказують офіційні або первинні джерела. Відкрийте кожне джерело, щоб побачити дати публікації, обмеження і те, чого джерело не доводить.

Аналіз

Перевірені цифри не дорівнюють повному масштабу шкоди

Висока надійність

Дані УВКПЛ про цивільні втрати цінні саме тому, що вони перевірені, але власне обмеження джерела полягає в тому, що реальні цифри, ймовірно, вищі. Сайт має завжди вказувати цю межу.

Аналіз

Кожне велике число має мати дату оцінки

Висока надійність

RDNA5 є авторитетною для свого періоду оцінки, але не для збитків після 31 грудня 2025 року. Модель контенту має тримати дати поруч із кожною цифрою.

Аналіз

Панелі джерел мають пояснювати, чого джерело не доводить

Висока надійність

Поточна схема джерел розділяє поля підтверджує, не доводить і обмеження, щоб читачі бачили невизначеність, а не непідтверджену впевненість.

Розділи

Аналіз

Зв'язок твердження з джерелом

Висока надійність

Кожне фактичне твердження має бути повʼязане з одним або кількома записами джерел. Запис має показувати, що саме підтверджує джерело і чи використовується воно для перевіреного факту, аналізу, сценарію або обмеження.

Такий звʼязок не дає загальним розповідям про війну відриватися від доказів. Читач може перевірити окреме речення, не сперечаючись з усією сторінкою, бо твердження, джерело й застереження видно разом.

Ключові висновки

Повʼязувати твердження з ідентифікаторами джерел, а не лише із загальною бібліографією.
Розділяти те, що джерело підтверджує, і те, чого воно не доводить.
Залишати мітки видимими, коли аналіз спирається на перевірені факти.
Вважати твердження без джерел чернетками до перевірки.

Аналіз

Дата публікації

Висока надійність

Дата публікації показує, коли джерело увійшло до публічного запису. Для воєнних даних це важливо, бо відомості про втрати, відновлення, фронт, санкції та ядерну безпеку можуть швидко змінюватися.

Оцінку з датою не можна розширювати за межі її періоду. Наприклад, цифру відновлення за шкодою до 31 грудня 2025 року не можна подавати як вартість пізнішої шкоди без нового джерела.

Ключові висновки

Показувати дату публікації поруч із великими числами й чутливими до часу твердженнями.
Відокремлювати період оцінки від дати публікації.
Не змішувати цифри з різних дат без пояснення різниці.
Замінювати застарілі дані після додавання нового авторитетного джерела.

Аналіз

Дата доступу

Висока надійність

Дата доступу фіксує, коли сайт востаннє перевіряв джерело. Це не те саме, що дата публікації, і її не можна використовувати, щоб старе джерело виглядало новим.

Дати доступу допомагають читачам розуміти надійність посилань і частоту перевірки. Якщо організація змінює сторінку, переносить документ або оновлює таблицю, сайт може показати, коли попереднє твердження перевірялося.

Ключові висновки

Записувати дату останньої перевірки джерела сайтом.
Не замінювати дату публікації датою доступу.
Використовувати дати доступу для пріоритетної перевірки мінливих тверджень.
Оновлювати дату лише після реальної повторної перевірки джерела.

Аналіз

Тип джерела

Висока надійність

Тип джерела показує, чи є запис первинним документом, урядовим релізом, звітом міжнародної організації, дослідженням, журналістським матеріалом або матеріалом НУО. Категорія описує походження, але не замінює оцінку довіри.

Різні типи джерел відповідають на різні питання. Текст договору може підтримувати правову рамку, оновлення МАГАТЕ — твердження про ядерну безпеку, а дослідження — економічні механізми, якщо показано його припущення.

Ключові висновки

Класифікувати джерела за походженням і методом.
Не замінювати читання обмежень типом джерела.
Використовувати первинні документи для юридичних текстів, коли це можливо.
Поєднувати аналіз із тим типом джерела, який справді може його підтримати.

Аналіз

Рівень упевненості

Висока надійність

Мітки впевненості показують, наскільки надійно можна використовувати твердження, повʼязане з джерелом. Враховуються якість джерела, точність, актуальність, підтвердження іншими даними й те, чи залишається формулювання в межах доведеного.

Висока впевненість не означає знання всіх прихованих фактів, а низька впевненість не означає, що твердження хибне. Це редакційний сигнал про те, наскільки обережно слід повторно використовувати твердження.

Ключові висновки

Використовувати високий рівень для конкретних, актуальних і добре підтверджених тверджень.
Використовувати середній або низький рівень, коли дані непрямі, модельні або спірні.
Переглядати впевненість, коли нові джерела змінюють доказову базу.
Залишати мітки впевненості видимими в графіках, картках і завантаженнях.

Аналіз

Обмеження

Висока надійність

Обмеження пояснюють, чого джерело не доводить, де закінчується його період даних і які припущення впливають на твердження. Вони не дають правдивому реченню стати оманливим під час копіювання без контексту.

Це особливо важливо для перевірених мінімумів, модельних сценаріїв і оцінок відновлення. Перевірена цифра втрат може занижувати загальну шкоду, а оцінка збитків може бути надійною для однієї дати й неповною для пізніших атак.

Ключові висновки

Писати обмеження простою мовою, а не лише технічними застереженнями.
Показувати, чого джерело не доводить, разом із тим, що воно підтверджує.
Зберігати невизначеність під час перекладу й завантаження матеріалів.
Не ховати суттєві припущення лише у виносках.

Аналіз

Архівне посилання

Висока надійність

Архівні посилання зберігають вигляд джерела приблизно на момент перевірки. Вони допомагають перевірити твердження, якщо жива сторінка пізніше змінилася, переїхала або стала недоступною.

Архів не замінює живе джерело й не робить слабке джерело сильнішим. Це інструмент довговічності й прозорості, особливо для публічних документів, пресрелізів і наборів даних, які можуть переглядатися.

Ключові висновки

Додавати архівні посилання там, де це дозволяють джерело й права.
Зберігати живі URL поруч з архівними URL.
Використовувати архіви для перевірюваності, а не для заморожування виправлень.
Чітко позначати відсутність архіву, а не вигадувати його.

Аналіз

Історія виправлень

Висока надійність

Історія виправлень фіксує, що змінилося, коли і чому. Вона має охоплювати виправлення чисел, заміну джерел, формулювання, що змінюють зміст, а також оновлення перекладів і завантажуваних матеріалів.

Виправлення підтримують довіру, бо роблять зміни видимими, а не мовчки переписують запис. Мета не в покаранні за помилки, а в збереженні зрозумілого ланцюга доказів після публікації.

Ключові висновки

Записувати дату, порушене твердження й причину суттєвого виправлення.
Зберігати достатньо попереднього контексту, щоб читачі зрозуміли зміну.
Оновлювати повʼязані графіки, завантаження й переклади, якщо виправлення впливає на них.
Відрізняти дрібну правку тексту від виправлень, що змінюють зміст.

Web radar scan website registry

These publications and research institutes are the monitoring registry used by the AI web radar. Direct RSS feeds are used where configured; the broader list is scanned through public Google News RSS index groups by source name, Ukraine-war query terms and seven-day recency.

Catalogued sources

493

Publications

195

Research institutes

298

Countries

Active scan feeds

Africa / Publications (12)

Name	Country	Type	Focus	Scan region	Priority	Scan URL
Jeune Afrique	Francophone Africa	Magazine	African politics and business	africa	core	Public scan
Daily Nation	Kenya	Newspaper	Kenya news	africa	standard	Public scan
The Standard Kenya	Kenya	Newspaper	Kenya news	africa	standard	Public scan
Premium Times	Nigeria	Digital publication	Nigeria politics and investigations	africa	standard	Public scan
The Guardian Nigeria	Nigeria	Newspaper	Nigeria news	africa	standard	Public scan
The Punch	Nigeria	Newspaper	Nigeria news	africa	standard	Public scan
THISDAY	Nigeria	Newspaper	Nigeria news	africa	standard	Public scan
The Africa Report	Pan-African	Magazine	African politics and business	africa	core	Public scan
Business Day South Africa	South Africa	Newspaper	Business and politics	africa	standard	Public scan
Daily Maverick	South Africa	Digital publication	Politics and investigations	africa	standard	Public scan
Mail & Guardian	South Africa	Newspaper	Politics and investigations	africa	standard	Public scan
Sunday Times South Africa	South Africa	Newspaper	South Africa news	africa	standard	Public scan

Africa / Research institutes (18)

Name	Country	Type	Focus	Scan region	Priority	Scan URL
Institute for Peace and Security Studies Addis Ababa University	Ethiopia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	africa	standard	Public scan
Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre	Ghana	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	africa	standard	Public scan
Horn Institute for Strategic Studies	Kenya	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	africa	standard	Public scan
Moroccan Institute for Policy Analysis	Morocco	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	africa	standard	Public scan
Policy Center for the New South	Morocco	Think tank / research institute	Global South and policy research	africa	core	Public scan
Centre for Democracy and Development West Africa	Nigeria	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	africa	standard	Public scan
Nigerian Institute of International Affairs	Nigeria	Think tank / research institute	International affairs	africa	core	Public scan
African Center for Strategic Studies	Pan-African	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	africa	standard	Public scan
African Centre for the Study and Research on Terrorism	Pan-African	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	africa	standard	Public scan
African Policy Research Institute	Pan-African	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	africa	standard	Public scan
Afrobarometer	Pan-African	Think tank / research institute	Public opinion and governance data	africa	standard	Public scan
Institute for Security Studies Africa	Pan-African	Think tank / research institute	Peace, security, governance and development	africa	core	Public scan
Timbuktu Institute	Senegal	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	africa	standard	Public scan
WATHI	Senegal	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	africa	standard	Public scan
Brenthurst Foundation	South Africa	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	africa	standard	Public scan
Institute for Global Dialogue	South Africa	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	africa	standard	Public scan
South African Institute of International Affairs	South Africa	Think tank / research institute	International affairs	africa	core	Public scan
Tunisian Institute for Strategic Studies	Tunisia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	africa	standard	Public scan

Asia-Pacific / Publications (40)

Name	Country	Type	Focus	Scan region	Priority	Scan URL
The Daily Star Bangladesh	Bangladesh	Newspaper	Politics and society	asia	standard	Public scan
Caixin	China	Business publication	Economics, business, investigations	asia	core	Public scan
China Daily	China	State newspaper	English-language state coverage	asia	standard	Public scan
Global Times	China	State-linked publication	International and political commentary	asia	standard	Public scan
People's Daily	China	Official/state newspaper	State political coverage	asia	standard	Public scan
Xinhua	China	State news agency	State news coverage	asia	standard	Public scan
South China Morning Post	Hong Kong	Newspaper	Hong Kong, China, international affairs	asia	standard	Public scan
The Standard Hong Kong	Hong Kong	Newspaper	Hong Kong news	asia	standard	Public scan
Business Standard	India	Newspaper	Economics	asia	standard	Public scan
Frontline	India	Magazine	Politics and current affairs	asia	core	Public scan
Hindustan Times	India	Newspaper	General news and politics	asia	standard	Public scan
India Today	India	Magazine	News and current affairs	asia	core	Public scan
The Caravan	India	Magazine	Long-form politics and investigations	asia	standard	Public scan
The Economic Times	India	Newspaper	Economics and business	asia	standard	Public scan
The Hindu	India	Newspaper	Politics and international affairs	asia	standard	Public scan
The Indian Express	India	Newspaper	Politics and investigations	asia	standard	Public scan
The Times of India	India	Newspaper	General news	asia	standard	Public scan
Tempo	Indonesia	Magazine	Politics and investigations	asia	standard	Public scan
The Jakarta Post	Indonesia	Newspaper	Indonesia and international affairs	asia	standard	Public scan
Asahi Shimbun	Japan	Newspaper	General news and politics	asia	standard	Public scan
Mainichi Shimbun	Japan	Newspaper	General news and politics	asia	standard	Public scan
Nikkei	Japan	Newspaper	Economics and business	asia	standard	Public scan
Nikkei Asia	Japan	Digital publication	Asian economics and geopolitics	asia	core	Public scan
Sankei Shimbun	Japan	Newspaper	Politics and general news	asia	standard	Public scan
The Japan Times	Japan	English-language newspaper	Japan and world coverage	asia	standard	Public scan
Yomiuri Shimbun	Japan	Newspaper	General news and politics	asia	standard	Public scan
Malaysiakini	Malaysia	Digital publication	Politics and society	asia	standard	Public scan
Dawn	Pakistan	Newspaper	Politics and society	asia	standard	Public scan
The News International	Pakistan	Newspaper	General news	asia	standard	Public scan
Philippine Daily Inquirer	Philippines	Newspaper	Philippines news	asia	standard	Public scan
Rappler	Philippines	Digital publication	Politics and investigations	asia	standard	Public scan
The Straits Times	Singapore	Newspaper	Singapore and world news	asia	standard	Public scan
Chosun Ilbo	South Korea	Newspaper	Politics and general news	asia	standard	Public scan
Dong-A Ilbo	South Korea	Newspaper	Politics and general news	asia	standard	Public scan
Hankyoreh	South Korea	Newspaper	Politics and society	asia	standard	Public scan
JoongAng Ilbo	South Korea	Newspaper	Politics and general news	asia	standard	Public scan
Korea Herald	South Korea	Newspaper	English-language Korea/world news	asia	standard	Public scan
Korea Times	South Korea	Newspaper	English-language Korea/world news	asia	standard	Public scan
Bangkok Post	Thailand	Newspaper	Thailand and world news	asia	standard	Public scan
The Nation Thailand	Thailand	Newspaper	Thailand news	asia	standard	Public scan

Asia-Pacific / Research institutes (49)

Name	Country	Type	Focus	Scan region	Priority	Scan URL
Bangladesh Institute of International and Strategic Studies	Bangladesh	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	asia	standard	Public scan
Cambodian Institute for Cooperation and Peace	Cambodia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	asia	standard	Public scan
Center for China and Globalization	China	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	asia	standard	Public scan
Center for International Security and Strategy Tsinghua University	China	Think tank / research institute	International security	asia	core	Public scan
China Institute of International Studies	China	Think tank / research institute	International studies	asia	core	Public scan
China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations	China	Think tank / research institute	International relations and security	asia	core	Public scan
Chinese Academy of Social Sciences	China	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	asia	standard	Public scan
Grandview Institution	China	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	asia	standard	Public scan
Institute of International and Strategic Studies Peking University	China	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	asia	standard	Public scan
Shanghai Institutes for International Studies	China	Think tank / research institute	International studies	asia	core	Public scan
Asia Global Institute	Hong Kong	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	asia	standard	Public scan
Centre for Air Power Studies	India	Think tank / research institute	Air power and security	asia	standard	Public scan
Centre for Land Warfare Studies	India	Think tank / research institute	Land warfare	asia	standard	Public scan
Gateway House	India	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	asia	standard	Public scan
Indian Council of World Affairs	India	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	asia	standard	Public scan
Institute of Chinese Studies India	India	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	asia	standard	Public scan
Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses	India	Think tank / research institute	Defence and strategic studies	asia	core	Public scan
National Maritime Foundation	India	Think tank / research institute	Maritime security	asia	standard	Public scan
Observer Research Foundation	India	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy and geopolitics	asia	core	Public scan
Takshashila Institution	India	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	asia	standard	Public scan
United Service Institution of India	India	Think tank / research institute	Defence and security	asia	standard	Public scan
Vivekananda International Foundation	India	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	asia	standard	Public scan
CSIS Indonesia	Indonesia	Think tank / research institute	Strategic and international studies	asia	core	Public scan
Habibie Center	Indonesia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	asia	standard	Public scan
Genron NPO	Japan	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	asia	standard	Public scan
Japan Institute of International Affairs	Japan	Think tank / research institute	International affairs	asia	core	Public scan
Nakasone Peace Institute	Japan	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	asia	standard	Public scan
National Institute for Defense Studies Japan	Japan	Think tank / research institute	Defence studies	asia	standard	Public scan
Research Center for Nuclear Weapons Abolition	Japan	Think tank / research institute	Nuclear weapons abolition	asia	standard	Public scan
Sasakawa Peace Foundation	Japan	Think tank / research institute	Peace and international affairs	asia	standard	Public scan
Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs	Malaysia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	asia	standard	Public scan
Institute of Strategic and International Studies Malaysia	Malaysia	Think tank / research institute	Strategic and international studies	asia	core	Public scan
Institute for Strategic Studies of Mongolia	Mongolia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	asia	standard	Public scan
Institute of Strategic Studies Islamabad	Pakistan	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	asia	standard	Public scan
Islamabad Policy Research Institute	Pakistan	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	asia	standard	Public scan
Stratbase ADR Institute	Philippines	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	asia	standard	Public scan
Institute of South Asian Studies Singapore	Singapore	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	asia	standard	Public scan
ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute	Singapore	Think tank / research institute	Southeast Asia research	asia	core	Public scan
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies	Singapore	Think tank / research institute	Security and international studies	asia	core	Public scan
Asan Institute for Policy Studies	South Korea	Think tank / research institute	Policy and security research	asia	core	Public scan
Asia-Pacific Leadership Network	South Korea	Think tank / research institute	Nuclear risk reduction	asia	standard	Public scan
East Asia Institute South Korea	South Korea	Think tank / research institute	International affairs	asia	core	Public scan
Korea Institute for Defense Analyses	South Korea	Think tank / research institute	Defence analysis	asia	standard	Public scan
Korea Institute for International Economic Policy	South Korea	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	asia	standard	Public scan
Korea Institute for National Unification	South Korea	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	asia	standard	Public scan
Sejong Institute	South Korea	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	asia	standard	Public scan
Institute for National Defense and Security Research	Taiwan	Think tank / research institute	National defence and security	asia	core	Public scan
Institute of Security and International Studies Thailand	Thailand	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	asia	standard	Public scan
Diplomatic Academy of Vietnam	Vietnam	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	asia	standard	Public scan

Caucasus / Research institutes (5)

Name	Country	Type	Focus	Scan region	Priority	Scan URL
APRI Armenia	Armenia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	world	standard	Public scan
Caucasus Institute	Armenia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	world	standard	Public scan
AIR Center Azerbaijan	Azerbaijan	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	world	standard	Public scan
Georgian Institute of Politics	Georgia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	world	standard	Public scan
Rondeli Foundation	Georgia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	world	standard	Public scan

Europe / Publications (62)

Name	Country	Type	Focus	Scan region	Priority	Scan URL
Der Standard	Austria	Newspaper	Politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
Die Presse	Austria	Newspaper	Politics and business	ec	standard	Public scan
Delfi	Baltic states	Digital newspaper	Baltic politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
De Tijd	Belgium	Newspaper	Business and politics	ec	standard	Public scan
Le Soir	Belgium	Newspaper	Politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
Respekt	Czech Republic	Magazine	Politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
Berlingske	Denmark	Newspaper	Politics and business	ec	standard	Public scan
Jyllands-Posten	Denmark	Newspaper	Politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
Politiken	Denmark	Newspaper	Politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
Helsingin Sanomat	Finland	Newspaper	Politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
L'Express	France	Magazine	Politics and current affairs	ec	standard	Public scan
L'Obs	France	Magazine	Politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
Le Figaro	France	Newspaper	Politics and international news	ec	standard	Public scan
Le Monde	France	Newspaper	Politics and international news	ec	core	Public scan
Le Monde diplomatique	France	International-affairs monthly	International politics and analysis	ec	core	Public scan
Le Point	France	Magazine	Politics and current affairs	ec	core	Public scan
Les Echos	France	Financial newspaper	Economics and business	ec	standard	Public scan
Liberation	France	Newspaper	Politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
Marianne	France	Political magazine	Politics and commentary	ec	standard	Public scan
Der Spiegel	Germany	Current-affairs magazine	Politics and investigations	ec	core	Public scan
Die Tageszeitung	Germany	Newspaper	Politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
Die Welt	Germany	Newspaper	Politics and international affairs	ec	standard	Public scan
Die Zeit	Germany	Weekly newspaper	Politics, society, analysis	ec	core	Public scan
Focus	Germany	News magazine	Current affairs	ec	standard	Public scan
Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung	Germany	Newspaper	Politics and business	ec	standard	Public scan
Handelsblatt	Germany	Business newspaper	Economics and business	ec	standard	Public scan
Stern	Germany	News magazine	Current affairs	ec	standard	Public scan
Sueddeutsche Zeitung	Germany	Newspaper	Politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
HVG	Hungary	Magazine	Politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
Telex	Hungary	Digital newspaper	Politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
Corriere della Sera	Italy	Newspaper	Politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
Il Foglio	Italy	Political newspaper	Politics and commentary	ec	standard	Public scan
Il Sole 24 Ore	Italy	Financial newspaper	Economics and business	ec	standard	Public scan
Internazionale	Italy	International affairs magazine	International politics	ec	core	Public scan
L'Espresso	Italy	Current-affairs publication	Politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
La Repubblica	Italy	Newspaper	Politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
La Stampa	Italy	Newspaper	Politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
De Telegraaf	Netherlands	Newspaper	General news	ec	standard	Public scan
de Volkskrant	Netherlands	Newspaper	Politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
NRC	Netherlands	Newspaper	Politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
Aftenposten	Norway	Newspaper	Politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
Dagens Naeringsliv	Norway	Business newspaper	Economics and business	ec	standard	Public scan
Gazeta Wyborcza	Poland	Newspaper	Politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
Rzeczpospolita	Poland	Newspaper	Politics and business	ec	standard	Public scan
Diario de Noticias	Portugal	Newspaper	Politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
Expresso	Portugal	Newspaper	Politics and analysis	ec	standard	Public scan
Publico Portugal	Portugal	Newspaper	Politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
Dennik N	Slovakia	Newspaper	Politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
ABC	Spain	Newspaper	Politics and current affairs	ec	standard	Public scan
El Confidencial	Spain	Digital newspaper	Politics and investigations	ec	standard	Public scan
El Mundo	Spain	Newspaper	Politics and current affairs	ec	standard	Public scan
El Pais	Spain	Newspaper	Politics and international news	ec	standard	Public scan
La Vanguardia	Spain	Newspaper	Politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
Aftonbladet	Sweden	Newspaper	General news	ec	standard	Public scan
Dagens Nyheter	Sweden	Newspaper	Politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
Expressen	Sweden	Newspaper	General news	ec	standard	Public scan
Svenska Dagbladet	Sweden	Newspaper	Politics and business	ec	standard	Public scan
Neue Zuercher Zeitung	Switzerland	Newspaper	Politics, economics, international affairs	ec	standard	Public scan
Tages-Anzeiger	Switzerland	Newspaper	Politics and society	ec	standard	Public scan
European Pravda	Ukraine	Digital publication	Ukraine and European affairs	ukraine	core	Public scan
Kyiv Independent	Ukraine	Digital newspaper	Ukraine and international affairs	ukraine	core	Public scan
Ukrainska Pravda	Ukraine	Digital newspaper	Ukraine politics and war coverage	ukraine	core	Public scan

Europe / Research institutes (96)

Name	Country	Type	Focus	Scan region	Priority	Scan URL
Austrian Institute for European and Security Policy	Austria	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Austrian Institute for International Affairs	Austria	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis	Austria	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Vienna Center for Disarmament and Non-Proliferation	Austria	Think tank / research institute	Disarmament and non-proliferation	ec	standard	Public scan
Bruegel	Belgium	Think tank / research institute	Economics and European policy	ec	standard	Public scan
Brussels Institute for Geopolitics	Belgium	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Centre for European Policy Studies	Belgium	Think tank / research institute	European policy research	ec	core	Public scan
Centre for Security, Diplomacy and Strategy	Belgium	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Egmont Royal Institute for International Relations	Belgium	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
European Centre for International Political Economy	Belgium	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
European Institute of Peace	Belgium	Think tank / research institute	Peace mediation and conflict research	ec	standard	Public scan
European Peacebuilding Liaison Office	Belgium	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
European Policy Centre	Belgium	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
German Marshall Fund of the United States	Belgium / United States	Think tank / research institute	Transatlantic policy research	ec	standard	Public scan
Center for the Study of Democracy	Bulgaria	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Association for International Affairs	Czech Republic	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
EUROPEUM Institute for European Policy	Czech Republic	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Institute of International Relations Prague	Czech Republic	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Prague Security Studies Institute	Czech Republic	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Centre for Military Studies University of Copenhagen	Denmark	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Danish Institute for International Studies	Denmark	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Estonian Foreign Policy Institute	Estonia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
International Centre for Defence and Security	Estonia	Think tank / research institute	Defence and security	ec	core	Public scan
European Council on Foreign Relations	European Union	Think tank / research institute	European foreign policy	ec	core	Public scan
European Union Institute for Security Studies	European Union	Think tank / research institute	EU security and defence policy	ec	core	Public scan
Aleksanteri Institute	Finland	Think tank / research institute	Russia and Eastern Europe studies	ec	standard	Public scan
European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats	Finland	Think tank / research institute	Hybrid threats and resilience	ec	standard	Public scan
Finnish Institute of International Affairs	Finland	Think tank / research institute	Foreign and security policy	ec	core	Public scan
CEPII	France	Think tank / research institute	International economics	ec	standard	Public scan
Fondation Jean-Jaures	France	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Foundation for Strategic Research	France	Think tank / research institute	Strategic research	ec	standard	Public scan
French Institute for International and Strategic Affairs	France	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
French Institute of International Relations	France	Think tank / research institute	International relations	ec	core	Public scan
Institut Montaigne	France	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Bertelsmann Stiftung	Germany	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Bonn International Centre for Conflict Studies	Germany	Think tank / research institute	Conflict studies	ec	standard	Public scan
Center for Liberal Modernity	Germany	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
German Council on Foreign Relations	Germany	Think tank / research institute	German and European foreign policy	ec	core	Public scan
German Institute for Global and Area Studies	Germany	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
German Institute for International and Security Affairs	Germany	Think tank / research institute	International and security affairs	ec	core	Public scan
Kiel Institute for the World Economy	Germany	Think tank / research institute	Economics and global policy	ec	standard	Public scan
Mercator Institute for China Studies	Germany	Think tank / research institute	China research	ec	core	Public scan
Peace Research Institute Frankfurt	Germany	Think tank / research institute	Peace and conflict research	ec	standard	Public scan
Hellenic Foundation for European and Foreign Policy	Greece	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Danube Institute	Hungary	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Equilibrium Institute	Hungary	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Hungarian Institute of International Affairs	Hungary	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
International Crisis Group	International	Think tank / research institute	Conflict and crisis analysis	ec	core	Public scan
Institute of International and European Affairs	Ireland	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Centro Studi Internazionali	Italy	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei	Italy	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Istituto Affari Internazionali	Italy	Think tank / research institute	International affairs	ec	core	Public scan
Italian Institute for International Political Studies	Italy	Think tank / research institute	International political studies	ec	core	Public scan
Latvian Institute of International Affairs	Latvia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Eastern Europe Studies Centre	Lithuania	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
NATO Defence College	NATO	Think tank / research institute	Defence and strategic research	ec	standard	Public scan
NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence	NATO	Think tank / research institute	Strategic communications and information operations	ec	standard	Public scan
Clingendael Institute	Netherlands	Think tank / research institute	International relations	ec	core	Public scan
Hague Centre for Strategic Studies	Netherlands	Think tank / research institute	Strategic studies	ec	standard	Public scan
Transnational Institute	Netherlands	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Fridtjof Nansen Institute	Norway	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Norwegian Defence Research Establishment	Norway	Think tank / research institute	Defence research	ec	standard	Public scan
Norwegian Institute of International Affairs	Norway	Think tank / research institute	International affairs	ec	core	Public scan
Peace Research Institute Oslo	Norway	Think tank / research institute	Peace and conflict research	ec	core	Public scan
Casimir Pulaski Foundation	Poland	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Centre for Eastern Studies	Poland	Think tank / research institute	Eastern Europe and Russia research	ec	core	Public scan
Polish Institute of International Affairs	Poland	Think tank / research institute	International affairs	ec	core	Public scan
Warsaw Institute	Poland	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
National Defence Institute Portugal	Portugal	Think tank / research institute	Defence policy	ec	standard	Public scan
Portuguese Institute of International Relations	Portugal	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
New Strategy Center	Romania	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Belgrade Centre for Security Policy	Serbia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
GLOBSEC	Slovakia	Think tank / research institute	Security and foreign policy	ec	core	Public scan
Slovak Foreign Policy Association	Slovakia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Barcelona Centre for International Affairs	Spain	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Elcano Royal Institute	Spain	Think tank / research institute	International and strategic studies	ec	core	Public scan
Fundacion Alternativas	Spain	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Institute for Security and Development Policy	Sweden	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Stockholm Centre for Eastern European Studies	Sweden	Think tank / research institute	Eastern Europe and Russia research	ec	standard	Public scan
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute	Sweden	Think tank / research institute	Conflict, armaments, arms control and disarmament	ec	core	Public scan
Swedish Defence Research Agency	Sweden	Think tank / research institute	Defence research	ec	standard	Public scan
Swedish Institute of International Affairs	Sweden	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue	Switzerland	Think tank / research institute	Mediation and peace processes	ec	standard	Public scan
Geneva Centre for Security Policy	Switzerland	Think tank / research institute	Security policy	ec	core	Public scan
Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance	Switzerland	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ec	standard	Public scan
Small Arms Survey	Switzerland	Think tank / research institute	Weapons and conflict research	ec	standard	Public scan
Centre for Army Conversion and Disarmament Studies	Ukraine	Think tank / research institute	Defence and disarmament studies	ukraine	standard	Public scan
Centre for Defence Strategies	Ukraine	Think tank / research institute	Defence and security analysis	ukraine	standard	Public scan
Centre for Economic Strategy	Ukraine	Think tank / research institute	Economic policy	ukraine	standard	Public scan
Come Back Alive analytical department	Ukraine	Think tank / research institute	Defence and war analysis	ukraine	standard	Public scan
International Centre for Policy Studies	Ukraine	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	ukraine	standard	Public scan
Kyiv School of Economics Institute	Ukraine	Think tank / research institute	Economic and policy research	ukraine	standard	Public scan
National Institute for Strategic Studies Ukraine	Ukraine	Think tank / research institute	Strategic studies	ukraine	standard	Public scan
New Europe Center	Ukraine	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy and European integration	ukraine	standard	Public scan
Razumkov Centre	Ukraine	Think tank / research institute	Public policy and security research	ukraine	core	Public scan
Ukrainian Prism	Ukraine	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy research	ukraine	standard	Public scan

Latin America / Publications (16)

Name	Country	Type	Focus	Scan region	Priority	Scan URL
Clarin	Argentina	Newspaper	Argentina news	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
La Nacion Argentina	Argentina	Newspaper	Argentina politics and economy	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
Perfil	Argentina	Newspaper	Politics and current affairs	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
CartaCapital	Brazil	Magazine	Politics and society	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
Folha de S.Paulo	Brazil	Newspaper	Brazil politics and society	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
O Estado de S. Paulo	Brazil	Newspaper	Brazil politics and economy	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
O Globo	Brazil	Newspaper	Brazil news	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
Veja	Brazil	Magazine	Brazil current affairs	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
El Mercurio	Chile	Newspaper	Chile news	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
La Tercera	Chile	Newspaper	Chile news	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
El Tiempo	Colombia	Newspaper	Colombia news	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
Semana	Colombia	Magazine	Politics and current affairs	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
El Universal Mexico	Mexico	Newspaper	Mexico news	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
Proceso	Mexico	Magazine	Politics and investigations	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
Reforma	Mexico	Newspaper	Mexico politics	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
El Comercio Peru	Peru	Newspaper	Peru news	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan

Latin America / Research institutes (19)

Name	Country	Type	Focus	Scan region	Priority	Scan URL
Argentine Council for International Relations	Argentina	Think tank / research institute	International relations	latinAmerica	core	Public scan
CIPPEC	Argentina	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
Brazilian Center for International Relations	Brazil	Think tank / research institute	International relations	latinAmerica	core	Public scan
BRICS Policy Center	Brazil	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
Fundacao Getulio Vargas	Brazil	Think tank / research institute	Policy and economics research	latinAmerica	core	Public scan
Igarape Institute	Brazil	Think tank / research institute	Security and development	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
Institute for Applied Economic Research Brazil	Brazil	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
AthenaLab	Chile	Think tank / research institute	Security and strategy	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
Centro de Estudios Publicos	Chile	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
CEPEI	Colombia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
Fedesarrollo	Colombia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
Fundacion Ideas para la Paz	Colombia	Think tank / research institute	Peace and security	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
FLACSO Ecuador	Ecuador	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
Caribbean Policy Research Institute	Jamaica	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
Center for Research and Teaching in Economics	Mexico	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
Mexican Council on Foreign Relations	Mexico	Think tank / research institute	Foreign relations	latinAmerica	core	Public scan
Mexican Institute for Competitiveness	Mexico	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
Institute of International Studies Peru	Peru	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan
Uruguayan Council for International Relations	Uruguay	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	latinAmerica	standard	Public scan

Middle East / Publications (14)

Name	Country	Type	Focus	Scan region	Priority	Scan URL
Al-Ahram	Egypt	Newspaper	Egypt and regional news	middleEast	standard	Public scan
Al-Masry Al-Youm	Egypt	Newspaper	Egypt news	middleEast	standard	Public scan
Tehran Times	Iran	Newspaper	Iran and regional news	middleEast	standard	Public scan
Haaretz	Israel	Newspaper	Politics and society	middleEast	standard	Public scan
The Jerusalem Post	Israel	Newspaper	Israel and world news	middleEast	standard	Public scan
The Times of Israel	Israel	Digital publication	Israel and world news	middleEast	standard	Public scan
Asharq Al-Awsat	Pan-Arab	Newspaper	Pan-Arab politics	middleEast	standard	Public scan
Al Jazeera	Qatar	Broadcaster and digital publisher	Global politics and conflict coverage	middleEast	standard	Public scan
Arab News	Saudi Arabia	Newspaper	Saudi Arabia and world news	middleEast	standard	Public scan
Cumhuriyet	Turkey	Newspaper	Turkey politics	middleEast	standard	Public scan
Daily Sabah	Turkey	Newspaper	Turkey and regional news	middleEast	standard	Public scan
Hurriyet	Turkey	Newspaper	Turkey news	middleEast	standard	Public scan
Gulf News	United Arab Emirates	Newspaper	UAE and world news	middleEast	standard	Public scan
The National UAE	United Arab Emirates	Newspaper	UAE and world news	middleEast	standard	Public scan

Middle East / Research institutes (25)

Name	Country	Type	Focus	Scan region	Priority	Scan URL
Derasat	Bahrain	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	middleEast	standard	Public scan
Al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies	Egypt	Think tank / research institute	Political and strategic studies	middleEast	core	Public scan
Center for Middle East Strategic Studies	Iran	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	middleEast	standard	Public scan
Institute for Political and International Studies Iran	Iran	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	middleEast	standard	Public scan
Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies	Israel	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	middleEast	standard	Public scan
Institute for National Security Studies Israel	Israel	Think tank / research institute	National security studies	middleEast	core	Public scan
Israel Democracy Institute	Israel	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	middleEast	standard	Public scan
Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security	Israel	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	middleEast	standard	Public scan
Mitvim	Israel	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	middleEast	standard	Public scan
Carnegie Middle East Center	Lebanon	Think tank / research institute	Middle East policy research	middleEast	core	Public scan
Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research	Palestinian Territories	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	middleEast	standard	Public scan
PASSIA	Palestinian Territories	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	middleEast	standard	Public scan
Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies	Qatar	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	middleEast	standard	Public scan
Middle East Council on Global Affairs	Qatar	Think tank / research institute	Middle East policy research	middleEast	core	Public scan
Gulf Research Center	Saudi Arabia	Think tank / research institute	Gulf policy research	middleEast	core	Public scan
King Faisal Center for Research and Islamic Studies	Saudi Arabia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	middleEast	standard	Public scan
EDAM Centre for Economics and Foreign Policy Studies	Turkey	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	middleEast	standard	Public scan
Global Relations Forum	Turkey	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy and security	middleEast	core	Public scan
Istanbul Policy Center	Turkey	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	middleEast	standard	Public scan
ORSAM	Turkey	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	middleEast	standard	Public scan
SETA Foundation	Turkey	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	middleEast	standard	Public scan
TEPAV	Turkey	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	middleEast	standard	Public scan
Emirates Center for Strategic Studies and Research	United Arab Emirates	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	middleEast	standard	Public scan
Emirates Policy Center	United Arab Emirates	Think tank / research institute	Policy research	middleEast	core	Public scan
TRENDS Research & Advisory	United Arab Emirates	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	middleEast	standard	Public scan

North America / Publications (23)

Name	Country	Type	Focus	Scan region	Priority	Scan URL
La Presse	Canada	Digital newspaper	Canadian and world news	canada	standard	Public scan
Maclean's	Canada	Current-affairs magazine	Politics and society	canada	standard	Public scan
National Post	Canada	Newspaper	Politics and business	canada	standard	Public scan
The Globe and Mail	Canada	Newspaper	Politics, business, international affairs	canada	standard	Public scan
The Walrus	Canada	Magazine	Politics, culture, society	canada	standard	Public scan
Toronto Star	Canada	Newspaper	Canadian and world news	canada	standard	Public scan
Foreign Affairs	United States	Journal	Foreign policy and geopolitics	usa	core	Public scan
Foreign Policy	United States	Magazine	International affairs	usa	core	Public scan
Los Angeles Times	United States	Newspaper	US and world news	usa	standard	Public scan
National Review	United States	Magazine	Conservative politics and commentary	usa	standard	Public scan
Newsweek	United States	Magazine	Politics and current affairs	usa	standard	Public scan
Politico	United States	Digital newspaper	US politics and policy	usa	core	Public scan
Reason	United States	Magazine	Libertarian politics and policy	usa	standard	Public scan
The American Prospect	United States	Magazine	Politics and public policy	usa	standard	Public scan
The Atlantic	United States	Magazine	Politics, society, ideas	usa	core	Public scan
The Nation	United States	Magazine	Politics and commentary	usa	standard	Public scan
The New Republic	United States	Magazine	Politics and ideas	usa	standard	Public scan
The New York Times	United States	Newspaper	Politics, international news	usa	core	Public scan
The New Yorker	United States	Magazine	Politics, investigations, culture	usa	standard	Public scan
The Wall Street Journal	United States	Newspaper	Business, economics, politics	usa	core	Public scan
The Washington Post	United States	Newspaper	US politics, foreign affairs	usa	core	Public scan
Time	United States	Magazine	World affairs and current events	usa	standard	Public scan
USA Today	United States	Newspaper	General news	usa	standard	Public scan

North America / Research institutes (46)

Name	Country	Type	Focus	Scan region	Priority	Scan URL
Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada	Canada	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	canada	standard	Public scan
Canadian Defence and Security Network	Canada	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	canada	standard	Public scan
Canadian Global Affairs Institute	Canada	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	canada	standard	Public scan
Canadian International Council	Canada	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	canada	standard	Public scan
Centre for International Governance Innovation	Canada	Think tank / research institute	Global governance and policy research	canada	core	Public scan
Conference of Defence Associations Institute	Canada	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	canada	standard	Public scan
Institute for Research on Public Policy	Canada	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	canada	standard	Public scan
Macdonald-Laurier Institute	Canada	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	canada	standard	Public scan
American Enterprise Institute	United States	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	usa	standard	Public scan
Asia Society Policy Institute	United States	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	usa	standard	Public scan
Atlantic Council	United States	Think tank / research institute	Transatlantic security and geopolitics	usa	core	Public scan
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs	United States	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	usa	standard	Public scan
Brookings Institution	United States	Think tank / research institute	Public policy, foreign policy and economics	usa	core	Public scan
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace	United States	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy and international peace	usa	core	Public scan
Cato Institute	United States	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	usa	standard	Public scan
Center for a New American Security	United States	Think tank / research institute	National security and defence policy	usa	core	Public scan
Center for Global Development	United States	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	usa	standard	Public scan
Center for International Policy	United States	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	usa	standard	Public scan
Center for Security and Emerging Technology	United States	Think tank / research institute	Technology and security research	usa	standard	Public scan
Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments	United States	Think tank / research institute	Defence strategy and budgets	usa	standard	Public scan
Center for Strategic and International Studies	United States	Think tank / research institute	Strategic studies, defence, technology and geopolitics	usa	core	Public scan
Center for the National Interest	United States	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	usa	standard	Public scan
CNA	United States	Think tank / research institute	Defence and security research	usa	standard	Public scan
Columbia Center on Global Energy Policy	United States	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	usa	standard	Public scan
Council on Foreign Relations	United States	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy and international affairs	usa	core	Public scan
Federation of American Scientists	United States	Think tank / research institute	Nuclear, security and technology policy	usa	standard	Public scan
Foreign Policy Research Institute	United States	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	usa	standard	Public scan
Foundation for Defense of Democracies	United States	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	usa	standard	Public scan
Heritage Foundation	United States	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	usa	standard	Public scan
Hoover Institution	United States	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	usa	standard	Public scan
Hudson Institute	United States	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	usa	standard	Public scan
Jamestown Foundation	United States	Think tank / research institute	Russia, Eurasia and security research	usa	standard	Public scan
Middle East Institute	United States	Think tank / research institute	Middle East policy research	usa	standard	Public scan
MIT Security Studies Program	United States	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	usa	standard	Public scan
National Bureau of Asian Research	United States	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	usa	standard	Public scan
New Lines Institute for Strategy and Policy	United States	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	usa	standard	Public scan
Nuclear Threat Initiative	United States	Think tank / research institute	Nuclear security and arms control	usa	standard	Public scan
Pacific Forum	United States	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	usa	standard	Public scan
Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft	United States	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	usa	standard	Public scan
RAND Corporation	United States	Think tank / research institute	Security, defence and policy research	usa	core	Public scan
Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security	United States	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	usa	standard	Public scan
Stanford Center for International Security and Cooperation	United States	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	usa	standard	Public scan
Stimson Center	United States	Think tank / research institute	Security, conflict and arms control	usa	core	Public scan
United States Institute of Peace	United States	Think tank / research institute	Peace and conflict research	usa	standard	Public scan
Washington Institute for Near East Policy	United States	Think tank / research institute	Middle East policy research	usa	standard	Public scan
Wilson Center	United States	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy and regional research	usa	core	Public scan

Oceania / Publications (9)

Name	Country	Type	Focus	Scan region	Priority	Scan URL
Australian Financial Review	Australia	Financial newspaper	Business and politics	oceania	standard	Public scan
The Age	Australia	Newspaper	Australia news	oceania	standard	Public scan
The Australian	Australia	Newspaper	Australia and world news	oceania	standard	Public scan
The Monthly	Australia	Magazine	Politics and ideas	oceania	standard	Public scan
The Saturday Paper	Australia	Weekly newspaper	Politics and culture	oceania	standard	Public scan
The Sydney Morning Herald	Australia	Newspaper	Australia and world news	oceania	standard	Public scan
New Zealand Herald	New Zealand	Newspaper	New Zealand news	oceania	standard	Public scan
Newsroom New Zealand	New Zealand	Digital publication	Politics and investigations	oceania	standard	Public scan
The Post New Zealand	New Zealand	Newspaper	New Zealand news	oceania	standard	Public scan

Oceania / Research institutes (9)

Name	Country	Type	Focus	Scan region	Priority	Scan URL
Australian Institute of International Affairs	Australia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	oceania	standard	Public scan
Australian Strategic Policy Institute	Australia	Think tank / research institute	Strategic and defence policy	oceania	core	Public scan
Lowy Institute	Australia	Think tank / research institute	International policy	oceania	core	Public scan
National Security College Australian National University	Australia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	oceania	standard	Public scan
Perth USAsia Centre	Australia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	oceania	standard	Public scan
Strategic and Defence Studies Centre ANU	Australia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	oceania	standard	Public scan
United States Studies Centre University of Sydney	Australia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	oceania	standard	Public scan
Centre for Strategic Studies Victoria University of Wellington	New Zealand	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	oceania	standard	Public scan
New Zealand Institute of International Affairs	New Zealand	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	oceania	standard	Public scan

Russia / Eurasia / Publications (8)

Name	Country	Type	Focus	Scan region	Priority	Scan URL
Kommersant	Russia	Newspaper	Business and politics	russia	standard	Public scan
Mediazona	Russia	Digital publication	Courts, politics, civil affairs	russia	core	Public scan
RBC	Russia	Digital publication	Business, economics, politics	russia	standard	Public scan
Vedomosti	Russia	Newspaper	Economics and business	russia	standard	Public scan
Meduza	Russia / exile	Independent digital outlet	Russian-language politics and war coverage	russia	core	Public scan
Novaya Gazeta Europe	Russia / exile	Independent/exile publication	Politics and investigations	russia	core	Public scan
The Insider	Russia / exile	Investigative outlet	Investigations and politics	russia	core	Public scan
The Moscow Times	Russia / exile	Digital publication	English and Russian coverage	russia	core	Public scan

Russia / Eurasia / Research institutes (11)

Name	Country	Type	Focus	Scan region	Priority	Scan URL
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center	Germany	Think tank / research institute	Russia and Eurasia research	russia	core	Public scan
Council on Foreign and Defense Policy	Russia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	russia	standard	Public scan
IMEMO	Russia	Think tank / research institute	World economy and international relations	russia	standard	Public scan
Institute for US and Canadian Studies Russian Academy of Sciences	Russia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	russia	standard	Public scan
Institute of Europe Russian Academy of Sciences	Russia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	russia	standard	Public scan
Institute of Oriental Studies Russian Academy of Sciences	Russia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	russia	standard	Public scan
PIR Center	Russia	Think tank / research institute	Nuclear non-proliferation and security	russia	standard	Public scan
Russian Institute for Strategic Studies	Russia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	russia	standard	Public scan
Russian International Affairs Council	Russia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	russia	standard	Public scan
Valdai Discussion Club	Russia	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	russia	standard	Public scan
Kennan Institute	United States	Think tank / research institute	Russia and Eurasia research	russia	standard	Public scan

United Kingdom / Publications (11)

Name	Country	Type	Focus	Scan region	Priority	Scan URL
Financial Times	United Kingdom	Newspaper	Economics, business, international affairs	uk	core	Public scan
New Statesman	United Kingdom	Magazine	Politics, ideas, international affairs	uk	core	Public scan
Private Eye	United Kingdom	Magazine	Investigations, satire, politics	uk	standard	Public scan
Prospect	United Kingdom	Magazine	Politics, economics, ideas	uk	standard	Public scan
The Daily Telegraph	United Kingdom	Newspaper	Politics, business, international affairs	uk	standard	Public scan
The Economist	United Kingdom	Weekly	Global politics, economics, geopolitics	uk	core	Public scan
The Guardian	United Kingdom	Newspaper	Politics, society, international news	uk	core	Public scan
The Independent	United Kingdom	Digital newspaper	Politics and world affairs	uk	standard	Public scan
The Spectator	United Kingdom	Magazine	Politics, culture, commentary	uk	standard	Public scan
The Sunday Times	United Kingdom	Newspaper	Politics, investigations, analysis	uk	standard	Public scan
The Times	United Kingdom	Newspaper	UK and world politics	uk	standard	Public scan

United Kingdom / Research institutes (15)

Name	Country	Type	Focus	Scan region	Priority	Scan URL
British American Security Information Council	United Kingdom	Think tank / research institute	Nuclear arms control and security	uk	standard	Public scan
Centre for European Reform	United Kingdom	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	uk	standard	Public scan
Chatham House	United Kingdom	Think tank / research institute	Geopolitics, security, economics and regional affairs	uk	core	Public scan
European Leadership Network	United Kingdom	Think tank / research institute	Arms control, European security and risk reduction	uk	standard	Public scan
Henry Jackson Society	United Kingdom	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	uk	standard	Public scan
International Institute for Environment and Development	United Kingdom	Think tank / research institute	Environment, development and security links	uk	standard	Public scan
International Institute for Strategic Studies	United Kingdom	Think tank / research institute	Strategic studies, defence and security	uk	core	Public scan
King's College London Centre for Defence Studies	United Kingdom	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	uk	standard	Public scan
King's College London Centre for Grand Strategy	United Kingdom	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	uk	standard	Public scan
LSE IDEAS	United Kingdom	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	uk	standard	Public scan
ODI Global	United Kingdom	Think tank / research institute	Development, humanitarian and global policy	uk	standard	Public scan
Oxford Changing Character of War Centre	United Kingdom	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	uk	standard	Public scan
Oxford Institute for Ethics, Law and Armed Conflict	United Kingdom	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	uk	standard	Public scan
Policy Exchange	United Kingdom	Think tank / research institute	Foreign policy, geopolitics, defence and security research	uk	standard	Public scan
Royal United Services Institute	United Kingdom	Think tank / research institute	Defence and security research	uk	core	Public scan

World / Research institutes (5)

Name	Country	Type	Focus	Scan region	Priority	Scan URL
Arms Control Association	International	Think tank / research institute	Arms control and disarmament	world	standard	Public scan
Nautilus Institute	International	Think tank / research institute	Security and sustainability research	world	standard	Public scan
Verification Research Training and Information Centre	International	Think tank / research institute	Verification, arms control and treaty monitoring	world	standard	Public scan
NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence	NATO	Think tank / research institute	Cyber defence	world	standard	Public scan
Atlantic Council Digital Forensic Research Lab	United States	Think tank / research institute	Digital forensics and disinformation research	world	standard	Public scan

Source database

Each claim should map to a source record with publication date, accessed date, archive URL, source type, confidence, limitations and correction history. The sample records below are placeholders.

Placeholder statistic for a peak central-bank interest rate.

Replace with a central-bank release, date accessed and archive URL before publication.

Placeholder statistic for liquid sovereign-fund assets relative to GDP.

Replace with a verified dataset and calculation note before publication.

Placeholder source for nuclear-infrastructure risk pathways.

Replace with expert-reviewed sources and separate probability from consequence.

In June 2026, HRMMU verified at least 293 civilians killed and 1,990 injured in Ukraine; the actual number is likely higher.

OHCHR reports verified civilian casualties; actual figures are likely higher because verification access is limited in some areas.

OHCHR reported sustained attacks on Ukraine energy infrastructure during winter 2025-2026 and documented 1,272 civilians killed and 6,871 injured from 1 December 2025 to 31 May 2026.

Use the report period clearly; avoid implying the figure is an all-war total.

RDNA5 estimated Ukraine recovery and reconstruction needs at almost USD 588 billion over the next decade as of 31 December 2025.

The assessment covers damage and needs through 31 December 2025 and should be updated when a newer RDNA is released.

The 2026 Ukraine Humanitarian Needs and Response Plan estimated 10.8 million people would require humanitarian assistance and requested USD 2.3 billion to assist 4.1 million of the most vulnerable people.

Needs estimates can change with attacks, displacement and funding conditions.

IOM reported that as of December 2025 about 3.7 million people remained internally displaced in Ukraine and 4.41 million had returned.

Report data were collected from 15 October to 22 December 2025; use the collection period whenever citing displacement figures.

UNHCR reported 10.8 million people inside Ukraine needing humanitarian assistance in 2026 and 3.7 million internally displaced after the 2025-2026 winter.

Use alongside IOM and OCHA figures because agencies update estimates on different cycles.

In May 2025, the IAEA reported that Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant was relying on a single power line for essential nuclear safety and security functions, compared with ten before the conflict.

Check newer IAEA updates before publication because plant conditions can change quickly.

In June 2025, the IAEA reported that cooling-water and off-site power challenges would need to be fully resolved before any ZNPP reactors could be restarted.

Use as expert safety context; avoid catastrophe certainty language.

The IAEA Director General outlined five principles to prevent a nuclear accident at Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant to the UN Security Council in May 2023.

Use with current IAEA site updates for operational status.

IMF analysis found that defense-spending booms can raise inflation and fiscal pressure, with wartime booms especially costly and social spending vulnerable to crowd-out.

Treat as comparative macroeconomic analysis, not a direct estimate of this war cost.

IMF Ukraine program documents projected 2026 growth at about 1.8 to 2.5 percent, inflation around 7.5 percent and a fiscal deficit excluding grants above 19 percent of GDP under continued war assumptions.

Program projections can change with financing, attacks, energy conditions and battlefield developments; use the February 26, 2026 report date and assumptions.

UN Charter Article 33 lists negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, regional arrangements and other peaceful means as dispute-settlement routes.

Use as legal framework, not as a claim that negotiations are easy or sufficient.

ICRC explains that parties to armed conflict must allow and facilitate rapid and unimpeded passage of humanitarian relief for civilians in need, subject to control rights.

Use for legal obligations and concepts; pair with field reports for situation-specific claims.

OSCE Forum for Security Co-operation Decision No. 5/99 adopted the OSCE Communications Network Document, providing an institutional precedent for secure communications linked to arms-control and military notifications.

Use as historical and institutional precedent; current diplomatic access and participation constraints require separate verification.

Placeholder source record for any future military casualty figures.

Replace only with a reviewed source record that distinguishes killed, wounded, missing and captured, explains methodology and separates party claims from independent verification.

HRMMU reported that 2025 was the deadliest year for civilians in Ukraine since 2022, verifying 2,514 civilians killed and 12,142 injured in 2025.

HRMMU figures are verified minimums. State the year and verification limits whenever citing them.

WHO estimated that 4.1 million people in Ukraine would require health assistance in 2026 and that an estimated 10 million people were affected by a mental health crisis.

Appeal figures are planning estimates and should be updated when WHO releases a newer appeal.

WHO reported that attacks on Ukraine health care increased by nearly 20 percent in 2025 and that access to rehabilitation and assistive technologies remained severely limited.

Use the reported assessment dates and avoid presenting survey findings as universal clinical diagnoses.

WHO reported that more than 6,400 Ukrainians had received treatment abroad through medical evacuations since the start of the full-scale invasion, including patients needing trauma, burn, rehabilitation and prosthetic care.

Use as evidence of treatment pathways and unmet domestic capacity, not as a complete injury count.

UNICEF reported that more than one third of Ukraine’s children, 2,589,900 children, remained displaced four years into the war.

Use the publication date and specify whether a figure refers to children inside Ukraine, refugees abroad or both.

UNICEF reported 89 UN-verified child casualties in Ukraine in March 2026 and at least 3,452 children killed or injured since February 2022, while noting true figures are likely higher.

UNICEF cites UN-verified child casualties; actual numbers are likely higher.

UNICEF describes a safe, voluntary, dignified and individually assessed framework for the return and reintegration of Ukrainian children.

The UNICEF page identifies the brief as April 2026; the first day of the month is stored for schema compatibility.

ICRC reported that thousands of families across Ukraine endure uncertainty about missing or captured loved ones and described psychosocial support for families of the missing.

Use to describe the experience and support needs of families; avoid extrapolating a national total from this article.

IOM’s May 2026 veterans reintegration brief found that veterans’ economic and social reintegration can move in different directions and highlighted compounded vulnerabilities among displaced veterans and veterans with disabilities.

The brief draws on IOM General Population Survey rounds collected between October 2025 and March 2026.

Mediazona, BBC News Russian and volunteers maintain a named list of Russian military deaths in Ukraine using publicly verifiable sources; by 31 July 2026, Mediazona reported 7,465 confirmed officer deaths and stressed that recent data remain incomplete.

Use as an independently compiled minimum and methodology source. Avoid presenting it as an official Russian state total or as a complete accounting of all military losses.

ICRC reported that hostilities in and around Russia’s Kursk region caused thousands of families to leave their homes, left many displaced or searching for loved ones, and that ICRC helped 104 vulnerable Russian civilians return from Sumy to Russia via Belarus in late 2024 and March 2025.

Use for Kursk-related humanitarian needs and specific repatriation operations; do not generalize to all of Russia without additional sources.

ICRC reported that as of April 2026 it had visited more than 8,900 POWs on both sides, did not have full access to all POWs, and had provided 17,000 families with news of loved ones since February 2022.

The source states ICRC access remains incomplete; use it to explain humanitarian obligations and uncertainty rather than to claim a complete POW picture.

Human Rights Watch reported that in the fourth year of the full-scale war, Russian authorities escalated repression against critics, expanded censorship and surveillance, and continued policies that censor criticism of the war.

Use to explain the environment for publishing Russian testimony and grief; pair individual stories with consent and source checks.

Amnesty International reported that Russian authorities use centrally controlled curricula, textbooks and surveillance of students to justify the war and suppress independent thinking in schools across Russia and Russian-occupied Ukraine.

Use for system-level education and rights impacts; avoid claiming uniform individual beliefs among Russian children.

Russia’s Social Fund reported that rehabilitation centres recorded health improvements among 98% of participating demobilized SVO veterans in 2026 and described psychoemotional rehabilitation support.

Treat as an official administrative claim from a Russian state body; use with independent sources where available.

ICRC reported that its president visited the Russian Federation in July 2026 to discuss protection of civilians and civilian objects, access to prisoners of war and humanitarian outcomes through neutral intermediary work.

Use to explain access priorities and ICRC engagement, not as proof of compliance by any party.

UK Home Office statistics reported 14,725 out-of-country Ukraine Scheme visa grants in the year ending March 2026, 286,143 total grants since March 2022, 140,191 in-country extensions in the year ending March 2026, and that children made up 26% of arrivals under the Ukraine schemes.

Some arrivals may have left the UK temporarily or permanently. Use the end-March-2026 date with all figures.

The UK government factsheet reported 237,200 Ukrainian arrivals in the UK, including 177,600 through Homes for Ukraine, and 147,186 Ukraine Permission Extension grants as of 31 March 2026.

Use as a dated government factsheet; pair integration claims with more specific local or survey data when available.

UK guidance states that eligible Ukrainians and family members on Ukraine schemes can apply under the Ukraine Permission Extension scheme, with permission to work, study, rent and receive public funds; second UPE grants can extend permission by 24 months.

The scheme is temporary sanctuary; content should not imply permanence unless law changes.

FCDO travel advice warns against travel to large parts of Ukraine, says British nationals fighting in Ukraine have been killed or captured, and notes the UK government’s ability to assist in such circumstances is very limited.

Travel advice changes; check current FCDO page before reuse.

Placeholder source record for any future casualty totals involving British, American, EU or other foreign volunteers in Ukraine.

Replace only with a reviewed record that distinguishes nationality, military status, killed, wounded, missing and captured, and explains whether the source is official, consular, journalistic or family-reported.

GAO reported that from May 2022 through September 2024 DHS granted supporter-based humanitarian parole to about 774,000 beneficiaries across three processes, with 30% through Uniting for Ukraine, and that DHS later suspended or terminated these processes after fraud-risk concerns.

Use for DHS data through September 2024 and GAO findings through 2025; avoid treating it as a live operational count.

DHS extended Temporary Protected Status for Ukraine from 20 April 2025 through 19 October 2026 and said approximately 103,700 current beneficiaries could re-register.

TPS deadlines and legal status can change; verify current USCIS/DHS notices before publication.

The U.S. Department of State advises U.S. citizens not to travel to Ukraine because of Russia’s war, missile and drone attacks, active combat areas and limits on embassy assistance.

Travel advisories change; check the live page before reuse.

U.S. State Department guidance warns that children in crises may be temporarily separated from family, may not be eligible for adoption, and that Ukraine authorities were not approving children for temporary hosting at that time.

Use for general child-protection caution and verify current State Department adoption guidance for operational advice.

The U.S. Foreign Affairs Manual states that humanitarian assistance should save lives, alleviate suffering, provide protection and be grounded in humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence.

Use as policy framework, not as a Ukraine-specific funding dataset.

Eurostat reported 4.37 million non-EU citizens who fled Ukraine under temporary protection in the EU on 30 April 2026; adult women were 43.4%, adult men 26.7%, and minors 29.9% of beneficiaries.

Use the 30 April 2026 snapshot date and Eurostat definitions.

The Council of the EU agreed on 15 July 2026 to extend temporary protection for people fleeing Ukraine until 4 March 2028; as of 31 May 2026 it cited 4.38 million people under temporary protection in the EU.

Member-state implementation and transition pathways vary; use with national sources for country-specific advice.

The European Commission reported over €1.4 billion allocated for humanitarian aid programmes in Ukraine, over 159,000 tonnes of in-kind assistance delivered via the EU Civil Protection Mechanism, and EU temporary protection for over four million people from Ukraine.

Use with dated Commission page and sector-specific sources for outcomes.

European Commission civil protection and humanitarian aid reporting stated that 10.8 million people need humanitarian assistance in Ukraine in 2026, about 3.3 million people are believed internally displaced, and EU humanitarian funding supports cash, protection, health care, mental health and psychosocial support, shelter, food, water and education in emergencies.

Use as EU humanitarian operations context and pair with OCHA/UNHCR for global humanitarian-needs figures.

KSE Institute estimated Ukraine economy losses at USD 1.7 trillion in lost revenue and USD 0.6 trillion in lost value added by the end of 2026, with major losses concentrated in trade, industry, construction, services, agriculture, energy and transport.

Use as an analytical estimate based on KSE methodology and partner data; distinguish lost revenue and value added from direct physical damage.

The Kyiv Independent reported, citing a European Commission presentation it had seen, that Ukraine faced a EUR 19.6 billion defence funding gap in 2026 even after committed support and the expected EU Ukraine Support Loan component.

Treat as independent reporting on a document seen by journalists; pair with official EU and IMF sources where possible.

SIPRI reported that Russia’s federal budget funding of the war and other military spending reached about 16 trillion roubles in 2025, or 7.5 percent of GDP, and that planned 2026 military expenditure was 14.9 trillion roubles, or 6.3 percent of GDP, with amendment risk.

Publication gives month-level date. Use as open-source budget analysis and explain that Russia’s budget can be amended during the year.

Meduza reported that Russia’s January-May 2026 federal deficit reached 6.01 trillion roubles, spending on national defence and security accounted for nearly 40 percent of approved expenditures, and the economy’s structural problems were deepening under war spending.

Use as independent analysis citing official and business sources; keep claims tied to the article date.

Reuters reported that Russia’s 2026 federal spending and deficit could exceed official plans by more than 1 trillion roubles, with projected spending at 45.11 trillion roubles and an implied deficit of 4.83 trillion roubles.

Reuters article is accessed through an Investing.com mirror; verify against Reuters directly if available before publication.

The UK government factsheet updated 24 July 2026 said the UK had committed GBP 25 billion for Ukraine, including GBP 16 billion in military support, up to GBP 5.6 billion in non-military support and a GBP 3.5 billion export-finance cover limit.

Factsheet is periodically updated; use the 24 July 2026 version and do not mix older totals with newer totals.

The House of Commons Library reported that UK bilateral aid to Ukraine rose from GBP 204 million from 2010 before the full-scale invasion to GBP 342 million in 2022, GBP 250 million in 2023 and GBP 270 million in 2024, and that FCDO bilateral spending would be GBP 240 million a year from 2026/27.

Use with the publication date and update log; distinguish bilateral aid from military support and loan guarantees.

The House of Commons Library reported in February 2026 that the UK had pledged GBP 21.8 billion in support to Ukraine, with total military financing at GBP 13.06 billion, including gifted military assistance and the GBP 2.26 billion ERA loan.

Use for financing mechanics and February 2026 totals; pair current-total claims with the updated UK factsheet.

The U.S. Special Inspector General for Operation Atlantic Resolve reported that Congress had appropriated USD 195.03 billion since February 2022 for OAR and the Ukraine response, with USD 177.76 billion obligated and USD 116.02 billion disbursed through 31 March 2026, and no supplemental funding since April 2024.

Use the reporting period ending 31 March 2026 and distinguish appropriated, obligated and disbursed funds.

CFR summarized U.S. Ukraine-related spending through March 31, 2026 and noted no significant U.S. aid legislation since 2024 while European aid increased.

Secondary synthesis; spending categories and aid accounting vary by source.

European Parliamentary Research Service reported that Team Europe had mobilised around EUR 200 billion in financial, military and humanitarian assistance and that the EUR 90 billion Ukraine Support Loan would allocate indicative EUR 60 billion to defence industrial capacity and EUR 30 billion to macro-financial and budget assistance.

Use the May 2026 update date and pair with Commission/Council pages for current disbursement totals.

The European Commission reported that the EU had disbursed EUR 43.3 billion in macro-financial assistance, would support Ukraine with a EUR 90 billion loan for 2026-2027, and had disbursed EUR 11.6 billion from that loan so far as of the 30 July 2026 page update.

Use as a dated Commission page; amounts can change with disbursements and policy decisions.

The European Commission reported that the Ukraine Facility provides up to EUR 50 billion for 2024-2027, including financing tied to Ukraine’s recovery and reform plan, rule-of-law conditions, anti-corruption safeguards and investment mobilisation.

Use with current disbursement pages for totals and with Ukraine Plan documents for detailed reform steps.

The Kiel Ukraine Support Tracker update of 4 June 2026 found that European military support stayed high and drone-related allocations expanded, while financial and humanitarian aid allocations slowed markedly in the first four months of 2026, creating a widening gap between military and non-military aid.

Use tracker definitions for committed and allocated support; update when a newer tracker release is published.

Ukraine amended its 2026 state budget to add UAH 1.56 trillion for security and defence, backed by EU support.

Official fiscal communication should be checked against execution data as it becomes available.

Ukraine’s adopted 2026 budget prioritised defence and security while estimating large external financing needs.

Budget execution and later amendments can materially change the fiscal picture.

The IMF reported that Ukraine maintained macroeconomic stability under war conditions but faced intensifying pressures and reform delays.

IMF projections depend on assumptions about war duration, financing and policy implementation.

ILO identified displacement, demographic decline, labour shortages, skills mismatch and social vulnerability as core labour-market challenges for Ukraine.

Use with date labels and do not extend beyond what the source directly supports.

A Kyiv Independent opinion article argued that mobilising economically inactive women could ease Ukraine’s labour shortage and support recovery.

This is an opinion article and some estimates rely on survey and population assumptions.

Ukraine’s central bank governor said banks expanded lending and guarantees to the defence sector while still managing wartime credit risk.

Interview claims should be checked against NBU statistical releases and banking-sector disclosures.

The Kyiv Independent reported that a major Ukrainian iron mine suspended work after Russian attacks disrupted Black Sea maritime logistics.

Company statements and wartime reporting should be checked against trade and production data when available.

The Bank of Russia cut its key rate to 14.00 percent in July 2026 while warning that inflation risks and fiscal policy could require caution.

Russian official macro data should be read alongside independent analysis because some wartime data are restricted.

The Bank of Russia described a tight labour market, record-low unemployment and wage growth above productivity as continuing cost pressures.

Official wording may understate war-related political causes and should be compared with independent research.

Bank of Russia survey medians pointed to low growth, low unemployment and still-high key-rate expectations for 2026.

Consensus forecasts depend on available official data and may not capture hidden military or off-budget activity.

The Bell argued that higher oil prices helped Russian revenues but did not remove a structural budget deficit under wartime spending.

Treat projections and interpretation as analysis, not official fact.

The Bell reported that Russia had begun selling gold reserves through National Wealth Fund operations as liquid assets declined sharply from prewar levels.

Uses available official and market data but remains an analytical media source.

The Moscow Times reported that Russia’s 2026-28 budget and tax increases were designed to sustain high wartime spending.

Russian budget opacity means public-line analysis may understate total war-related costs.

IISS argued that Russia faces growing industrial, manpower and fiscal constraints under a prolonged war economy.

Forecasts about political economy constraints carry uncertainty and depend on policy choices.

A 2026 Russian academic article examined the scale, causes and policy responses to labour shortages in the Russian economy.

The article is in Russian and some full-text access may be restricted; use abstract-level claims cautiously.

OSW assessed that Russia’s low public debt masks costly debt service and a depleted liquid National Wealth Fund relative to prewar levels.

Relies on public and inferred data in an opaque wartime fiscal environment.

Interfax reported Russian Finance Ministry data showing the National Wealth Fund and its liquid assets declined through May 2026.

Based on official data in a context of partial wartime opacity.

The Bank of England reported that global energy shocks raised UK inflation risks and described channels through fuel, utilities, supply chains and expectations.

Scenarios are conditional and should not be treated as forecasts of a single outcome.

The Bank of England said global geopolitical shocks, including the Russia-Ukraine conflict backdrop, keep the risk environment unpredictable for energy-importing economies.

Combines several geopolitical shocks; use carefully when attributing causation.

IFS assessed that UK defence-spending commitments have major fiscal and economic consequences and could reshape public spending choices.

Predates some 2026 Ukraine-support updates and should be paired with Commons Library figures.

House of Commons Library reported that Ukraine support shifted toward procurement, joint production and European financing mechanisms as US policy changed.

Policy is evolving and should be updated as new aid mechanisms are adopted.

The Federal Reserve reported that U.S. inflation rose in 2026 as energy prices surged after a geopolitical shock.

Use as context for geopolitical energy transmission, not as a direct Ukraine-war cost estimate.

The Federal Reserve’s financial-stability survey identified geopolitical risks and oil shocks as leading near-term risks cited by respondents.

The report frames this section as respondent views rather than official Board conclusions.

CRS reported that U.S. security assistance for Ukraine relied on PDA, USAI and FMF, with no significant new Ukraine response funding since April 2024.

Publicly available data may lag deliveries and obligations.

CRS described how Ukraine-related U.S. appropriations fund newly manufactured weapons and replacement of U.S. stocks.

Some figures are from earlier supplemental cycles and should be paired with 2026 OAR/CRS updates.

CSIS argued that supporting Ukraine can replenish stockpiles and invest in U.S. defence-industrial capacity across many states.

Published before later 2025-26 funding and policy changes; use for industrial-base framing.

The European Commission forecast weaker EU growth, higher inflation and fiscal pressure from energy shocks, defence spending and support measures.

Forecast depends on energy-market assumptions and scenarios.

The European Commission reported more than EUR 4 billion in support for Ukraine’s energy security since the full-scale invasion.

Programme pages update over time; amounts should be checked before publication snapshots.

ECB analysis found that the Russia-Ukraine war sharply increased energy prices and volatility in euro-area energy markets.

Use as historical mechanism evidence, not as a current forecast.

NBER research found Russia-Ukraine geopolitical shocks affected agricultural commodities and European natural gas more strongly than some other markets.

Working-paper and published-version methodology should be read for model assumptions.

NBER research found longer expected conflicts make European households expect worse macroeconomic and personal financial outcomes and reduce consumption.

Scenario survey results should not be read as direct observed spending data.

CEPR research found Ukraine conflict exposure disrupted firm-to-firm supply chains and reduced output beyond direct conflict areas.

Uses evidence from the earlier 2014 conflict to model supply-chain mechanisms.

CEPR research found large interstate wars create output losses and inflation not only at the war site but also in nearby economies.

Historical averages should be used as mechanism evidence, not direct prediction.

Nature research found the Russia-Ukraine war produced cascading sectoral and regional impacts through food, energy and financial channels.

Modelled impacts require careful explanation of assumptions and uncertainty.

CEPR research modelled how sanction regimes and economic exposure can affect conflict incentives in the Russia-Ukraine case.

Counterfactual modelling is sensitive to assumptions and should be labelled as analysis.

IAEA reported repeated off-site power outages at ZNPP, its reliance on one remaining off-site line, automatic use of emergency diesel generators, staff pressure in Enerhodar, and reduced off-site radiation-monitoring redundancy.

IAEA reporting reflects information available to its team and may note access limits or claims from plant representatives.

IAEA reported military activity near several Ukrainian nuclear sites and another ZNPP loss of off-site power in July 2026, while calling for maximum military restraint.

Use as technical monitoring evidence, not as a full military-intelligence account.

Energoatom reported that ZNPP external power was restored on June 13, 2026 after a loss of external power and diesel-generator use, describing repeated blackouts as nuclear and radiation safety risks.

Energoatom is Ukraine’s state nuclear operator and a party with direct institutional interest; pair with IAEA monitoring.

A 49-delegation joint statement delivered by Ukraine argued that ZNPP should remain in cold shutdown and that restart requires restored Ukrainian regulatory control, demining, repairs, inspections and IAEA involvement.

Diplomatic statement; use alongside IAEA technical updates.

TASS reported Rosatom CEO Alexey Likhachev saying Russia had issued or prepared operating-license documentation for several ZNPP units while saying reactivation requires elimination of military-impact risks.

TASS is Russian state media; treat attribution and legal framing cautiously and compare with IAEA/Ukraine/EU/UK positions.

RIA Novosti reported Rafael Grossi saying restart of ZNPP would be too dangerous under current nearby hostilities and that no nuclear plant can operate safely under threat of force.

RIA Novosti is Russian state media; use only for attributed statements and cross-check against IAEA sources.

Meduza reported on concerns that Russia could use a blackout narrative to justify disconnecting ZNPP from Ukraine’s grid and integrating it into Russia’s system.

Analytical journalism relying on quoted experts and reported documents; keep uncertainty visible.

A Media, War & Conflict article analysed how Ukrainian and Russian media framed nuclear catastrophe risk around ZNPP and how nuclear anxiety can be politicised in wartime communication.

Communication study; pair with technical nuclear-safety sources.

The UK told the IAEA Board that attacks on Ukraine’s energy grid degrade nuclear safety because substations and transmission nodes power cooling, monitoring and safety systems.

Diplomatic statement; use with IAEA technical updates.

The UK stated at the Convention on Nuclear Safety review meeting that ZNPP remains a Ukrainian installation and that Russian interference prevents effective Ukrainian regulatory control.

Legal-diplomatic statement; pair with technical inspections and IAEA monitoring.

The United States told the IAEA Board that strikes against critical energy infrastructure should cease because substations required for nuclear plants are vital to safe off-site power.

Diplomatic statement; use with IAEA and technical sources.

Union of Concerned Scientists expert Edwin Lyman argued that the crisis should not cause panic but also should not be dismissed, because accident or attack scenarios could create significant radiological consequences.

Opinion from an advocacy/research NGO; use as expert commentary rather than a verified incident report.

Annals of Nuclear Energy published a hypothetical radiological-impact assessment of a potential ZNPP accident, emphasizing that dispersion and dose outcomes depend on release assumptions and meteorology.

Hypothetical model; results depend on assumed release period, source term and meteorology.

The EU told the IAEA Board that attacks on substations and power lines supplying nuclear facilities diminish redundancy, increase reliance on safety systems and raise nuclear-safety risk.

Diplomatic statement; use with IAEA monitoring and technical modelling.

A Nuclear Engineering and Design paper reported a European benchmarking exercise on radiological consequences of a postulated severe ZNPP accident and emphasized international coordination for protective countermeasures.

Postulated severe accident study; keep scenario assumptions visible.

GOV.UK lists Andy Burnham as the current UK Prime Minister and says he became Prime Minister on 20 July 2026.

Ministerial role pages can change; re-check before publication.

IAEA PRIS listed 15 reactors in operation in Ukraine and 34 in operation in Russia in its operational reactors by country table updated in July 2026.

PRIS status categories are technical classifications and should not be conflated with battlefield exposure.

The OECD Nuclear Energy Agency summarized Ukraine nuclear-installation status, including April 2026 ZNPP off-site power losses, diesel-generator use, cooling-water arrangements and Chornobyl site events.

Use newer IAEA updates for later ZNPP outage counts.

IAEA reported in October 2022 that shelling damaged a power line supplying ZNPP reactor unit 6, causing temporary diesel-generator use while cooling was maintained.

Use for historical mechanism evidence, not for current outage counts.

IAEA reported in November 2022 that explosions and apparent shelling near and at ZNPP damaged buildings, systems and equipment, while no damage to critical nuclear safety systems had been reported at that time.

Damage details should be paired with NEA or later IAEA summaries where specific components are named.

World Nuclear News reported IAEA confirmation of April 2024 drone impacts at ZNPP, including superficial scorching on Unit 6's reactor dome and Grossi's warning that such attacks increased major-accident risk.

Industry journalism; the article relies heavily on IAEA and plant-side reporting.

The UK Food Standards Agency says Chernobyl fallout led to controls on around 9,800 UK holdings with more than four million sheep, and that the last controls were lifted from 1 June 2012.

Historical comparison only; reactor design, release size and weather would differ in any future event.

World Nuclear Association explains reactor safety through defence in depth, containment, cooling, reactivity control and institutional safety culture.

Industry association source; pair with regulators, IAEA and independent analysis.

World Nuclear Association explains wet and dry spent-fuel storage, shielding, heat removal, casks, and Ukraine's use of dry storage systems.

Industry association source; use alongside IAEA, national regulators and independent technical sources.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission describes spent fuel pools and dry casks as regulated storage methods that provide protection for public health, safety and the environment under normal regulatory conditions.

Use for technical concepts, not as a wartime site inspection.

IAEA reported in August 2023 that after the Kakhovka dam destruction ZNPP relied on the cooling pond, ZTPP discharge channel and groundwater arrangements, with plans for wells and continued monitoring.

Historical update; pair with later cooling-water status before publication.

A Water International article analysed the destruction of the Kakhovka dam and the reservoir's future, including effects on water supply to southern Ukraine and Zaporizhzhia power facilities.

Hydrological analysis; combine with IAEA nuclear-safety monitoring.

Arms Control Today summarized the April 2024 ZNPP drone strikes, IAEA warnings, Russian and Ukrainian accusations, and U.S. diplomatic comments.

Use as analysis and source aggregation, not as sole incident verification.

Congressional Research Service described nuclear safety pathways from military actions in Ukraine, including direct damage, safety-system damage, station blackout, personnel disruption and spent fuel damage.

Use with newer IAEA updates for current conditions.

Arms Control Today reported IAEA concerns after Russia barred remaining Energoatom employees from ZNPP, with Grossi warning that staff numbers had been significantly reduced and pressure was unsustainable.

Use alongside IAEA updates and operator/regulator statements.

ICRC explains that nuclear power plants and other dangerous-force installations have special protections under international humanitarian law and that parties should conclude further protective agreements.

Use for legal principles, not incident-level fact finding.

An Energy Research & Social Science article examined the protection of nuclear power plants in international law using ZNPP as the central case.

Legal analysis should be paired with technical evidence for safety conditions.

Carnegie analysis by Mark Hibbs argued that safely managing ZNPP offers a narrow field of options and that operating status, control and wartime constraints shape nuclear-safety risk.

Use as expert opinion/analysis and update with current monitoring.

Nuclear Threat Initiative called for a ceasefire around ZNPP, IAEA access, supplies for cooling and diesel generators, and emergency preparedness for possible radiological release.

Advocacy statement; label as opinion or analysis.

DiXi Group described the occupation of ZNPP as an unprecedented test for international mechanisms protecting nuclear infrastructure and highlighted proposals for stronger protection against military threats.

Advocacy and analysis; label accordingly.

A 2026 U.S. Helsinki Commission briefing discussed ZNPP control, nuclear recklessness, Russia's nuclear coercion and what support Ukraine needs to secure nuclear sites in a settlement.

Briefing/policy discussion; use as expert opinion and policy framing.

TASS reported that a Ukrainian drone hit a cooling tower of Kursk NPP-2 under construction, while Russian officials said operations were not disrupted and radiation background was normal.

Russian state media; use as attributed reporting and pair with IAEA or independent sources.

TASS reported IAEA notification from Russia that drone fragments were found roughly 100 metres from the Kursk NPP spent fuel storage facility in August 2024.

Russian state media; use as attributed reporting.

Interfax reported Rosatom CEO Alexey Likhachev saying repairs to the Dniprovska power line were completed during a temporary ceasefire with IAEA participation.

Attribution-heavy reporting; compare with IAEA monitoring before stating current operating status.

Interfax reported Grossi's concern over ZNPP water supply after the Kakhovka dam destruction and described wells and site work intended to keep the situation under control.

Use with IAEA updates for technical status.

Interfax-Ukraine reported IAEA information that a Russian drone strike damaged part of the Chornobyl Central Spent Fuel Storage Facility reception building while radiation levels remained normal.

Use with IAEA primary updates when available.

Chornobyl NPP reported that after the February 2025 drone strike the New Safe Confinement lost full leak-tightness but no releases above limits had been recorded and radiation monitoring was normal as of April 2026.

Operator statement; pair with IAEA assessment where possible.

A simple Poisson illustration using two major documented ZNPP episodes over approximately 4.4 years gives 1-exp(-2/4.4), or about 36.5%, for at least one comparable episode in another year if the same average rate continued.

The event selection is subjective, the rate assumption is unstable, and newer outage counts show why current data must be checked before publication.

KIIS reported February 2026 polling on Ukrainian attitudes to peace negotiations and a proposal to withdraw Ukrainian troops from Donbas in exchange for Western security guarantees.

KIIS notes wartime survey limitations and systematic deviations in addition to formal sampling error.

Ukraine and coalition partners stated in January 2026 that any peace agreement should include robust security guarantees and preserve Ukraine sovereignty and lasting security.

Political declaration; implementation depends on later legal, military and budget decisions.

A 2026 PILPG Journal article argues that a durable Ukraine peace process requires Ukrainian leadership, inclusive civil-society participation, monitored ceasefire, robust guarantees and legally binding obligations.

Normative legal and process analysis rather than battlefield forecasting.

Levada Center reported January 2026 Russian polling showing high support for Russian armed forces, majority support for negotiations, and expectations that the war would continue for a long time.

Polling in an authoritarian wartime environment may understate dissent or preference falsification.

Meduza analysed Russia budget pressure in 2026, citing a federal deficit above full-year target levels early in the year and large defence/security spending shares.

Analytical journalism drawing on official and business sources; use with primary fiscal data where possible.

Russia statement at the UNGA emergency special session framed diplomacy as the priority, rejected one-sided formulas, and argued that a hasty ceasefire could become a pause before renewed violence.

State advocacy source; present as Russia stated position, not neutral fact.

The UK House of Commons Library summarized 2025-2026 Ukraine peace-talk proposals, concerns about Russian-favourable terms, unresolved territorial questions and lack of breakthrough in early 2026 talks.

Briefing reflects information available as of publication and should be updated as talks evolve.

RUSI analysis by Jack Watling argued Russia aggression is likely to persist through 2026 unless Ukraine can sustain resistance and expand costs on the Kremlin.

Expert commentary, not a consensus forecast.

Chatham House argued that a Russia-Ukraine ceasefire could imperil Ukrainian and European security if badly designed or confused with a settlement.

Policy research with a clear security-policy argument; pair with opposing views.

CFR expert Thomas Graham argued in July 2026 that conditions may be ripe for peace talks, but Putin could still escalate and Washington would need shuttle diplomacy and leverage.

Expert take representing the author, not an official U.S. policy position.

MIT SSP summarized RAND work by Samuel Charap and Miranda Priebe arguing U.S. interests would be served by minimizing escalation risks and avoiding a protracted Russia-Ukraine conflict.

Published in 2023; use for framework, not current battlefield facts.

S&P Global Market Intelligence outlined 2026 conflict pathways, assessing continued attritional war as the most likely one-year outcome and a lasting peace agreement as extremely unlikely.

Commercial risk analysis; assumptions should be visible to readers.

European Council conclusions of 18 June 2026 reaffirmed support for Ukraine sovereignty, a just and lasting peace, credible security guarantees, ceasefire monitoring support and defence readiness.

Political conclusions; delivery depends on later EU and national decisions.

The European Commission describes the Ukraine Facility as up to EUR 50 billion in support from 2024 to 2027 for recovery, reconstruction, modernization, public services, investment and EU-accession reforms.

Official programme page; details can change with EU decisions and Ukrainian reform progress.

IAI analysed four post-war security guarantee models for Ukraine: ad hoc guarantees led by nuclear powers, NATO integration, an EU-based framework and neutrality.

Policy analysis of models and trade-offs, not a negotiated settlement text.

A Journal of Conflict and Security Law article analyses whether international law restrains Ukrainian consent to territorial concessions in a peace treaty under ongoing aggression.

Abstract-only access in the available page; use cautiously unless full text is reviewed.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine presents the Peace Formula as ten points including nuclear safety, food and energy security, release of prisoners and deportees, implementation of the UN Charter, withdrawal of Russian troops, justice, environmental safety, prevention of escalation and confirmation of the war ending.

Official Ukrainian government source; present as Ukraine stated position and pair with other perspectives.

The OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine operated from 21 March 2014 until 31 March 2022 as an unarmed civilian mission observing and reporting on the security situation and facilitating dialogue.

The mission is closed; use as precedent and lessons, not as an active mechanism.

Geneva Convention III Article 118 states that prisoners of war shall be released and repatriated without delay after the cessation of active hostilities.

Treaty rule; implementation depends on party compliance, verification and practical arrangements.

ICRC reported that by April 2026 it had visited more than 8,900 POWs on both sides, mainly in Ukraine, while not having full access to all POWs and civilian internees.

ICRC public reporting is constrained by confidentiality and operational access.

The UN Secretary-General welcomed a three-day ceasefire from 9 to 11 May 2026 and a planned large-scale prisoner exchange between Ukraine and Russia, facilitated by the United States.

Statement welcomes an announced arrangement; it is not a full implementation audit.

ICRC supported a large-scale repatriation of human remains between Russia and Ukraine in June 2025 after negotiations in Istanbul and reported more than 50 such repatriations since 2022.

Specific to human remains; use separately from live prisoner exchanges.

The European Commission welcomed adoption of the EU 21st package of sanctions against Russia on 23 July 2026, targeting energy, financial services, trade and the military-industrial complex.

Official EU framing; pair with independent economic analysis and compliance data.

Council of the EU sanctions timeline lists the 21st package adopted on 23 July 2026, including measures against individuals, entities, shadow-fleet vessels, financial institutions and oil price cap arrangements.

Official timeline; use with journalism and economic analysis for impacts and limits.

The UK House of Commons Library summarized proposals for a European-led Coalition of the Willing to help secure a future Ukraine peace deal, including deterrence operations and support for rebuilding Ukraine armed forces.

Briefing summarises proposals as of January 2026; later decisions may change details.

Georgetown Institute for the Study of Diplomacy capstone analysis argued in May 2026 that durable settlement efforts require reshaping leverage and incentives rather than diplomacy detached from pressure.

Capstone policy analysis; use as expert/pundit source rather than verified outcome data.

PFRU reported that more than 90,000 people were considered missing under special circumstances in Ukraine and described support for families living with ambiguous loss.

Use as NGO programme/reporting context and pair with ICRC or official records where legal status or tracing procedures are discussed.

A 2026 Scientific Reports mixed-methods study of non-displaced civilians in Kyiv suburbs found that resilience under war conditions is relational, structural and symbolic rather than only an individual trait.

Use for conceptual framing and carefully dated fieldwork, not as a national prevalence estimate.

Meduza, citing Okno interviews, reported that some relatives of exchanged Russian POWs feared the men would be sent back to the front instead of home.

Use as independent reporting based on interviews; protect relatives and avoid extrapolating beyond the article.

Levada Center reported in August 2025 that 58% of Russian respondents said the war had affected them or their families in some way, with affected respondents citing loss of loved ones, relatives or acquaintances fighting, emotional strain and economic hardship.

Treat as survey evidence under Russian political constraints; do not read answers as freely expressed personal testimony.

GAO reported that about 135,000 Ukrainian parole beneficiaries received HHS-administered refugee assistance in fiscal years 2022 through 2024, including cash, medical, employment, language, housing and legal support services.

Use for programme assistance through FY2024 and pair with DHS/TPS records for current legal status.

Pew Research Center reported April 2026 U.S. polling showing partisan differences on Ukraine support, lower confidence in President Trump decision-making on the war, and broad negative views of Russia and Putin.

Use for survey context only; distinguish public mood from legal status and humanitarian outcomes.

EUAA Asylum Report 2026 described temporary protection extensions, about 4.5 million people under temporary protection in EU+ countries at end-2025, and policy moves toward labour-market integration and transition pathways.

Use as policy and asylum-system context; national implementation differs across host states.

Ukrainska Pravda framed its 2025 long-form war coverage as stories of how war reaches families, classrooms, churches, kitchens and soldiers learning how to live again.

Use as independent-media narrative context and follow links to original stories for incident-level detail.

The UK and 40 other OSCE states invoked the Moscow Mechanism in May 2026 to investigate reported indoctrination, militarisation, coercion and forced assimilation of Ukrainian children by Russia.

Use as a diplomatic statement and mandate trigger; pair with investigative or monitoring reports for case details.

ICRC reported facilitating evacuations, repatriations and safe passage across front lines and borders for vulnerable civilians, including separated children, older people and people seeking to rejoin relatives.

Use for humanitarian movement categories and documented ICRC role, not as a comprehensive evacuation dataset.

IAEA PRIS country details list Ukraine reactor units by facility, including Chornobyl's permanently shut-down units and operating or under-construction units at Khmelnytskyy, Rivne, South Ukraine and Zaporizhzhya.

Use for PRIS facility and reactor status fields; pair with IAEA, NEA or operator updates for wartime safety conditions.

IAEA PRIS country details list Kursk reactor units in Kurchatov, Russian Federation, including shutdown, operating and under-construction units at Kursk and Kursk II.

Use for PRIS facility and reactor status fields only; attribute wartime incident details to the specific Russian or international reports cited alongside it.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission glossary defines key nuclear terms including source term, spent fuel, spent fuel pool, cold shutdown, decay heat, cask and related reactor-safety vocabulary.

Glossary page is a general U.S. regulatory reference; pair with IAEA, NEA and incident sources for Ukraine-specific risk context.

IAEA explains that emergency preparedness and response safety standards provide requirements, recommendations, guidelines and good practices for nuclear or radiological emergencies.

Use as standards-context language; use facility-specific IAEA and NEA updates for current site conditions.

HRMMU said civilian casualties in Ukraine rose in the first half of 2026, with 1,396 civilians killed and 7,978 injured from January through June and June 2026 recording the highest monthly total since April 2022.

Use as verified minimum civilian harm through June 2026; distinguish it from broader unverified claims and future casualty updates.

AP reported UN statements estimating that more than 16,000 Ukrainian civilians detained by Russia during the war remained held, often without legal justification, with widespread torture and mistreatment allegations.

News report based on UN statements; pair with OHCHR, ICRC and primary records for legal and monitoring claims.

Kiel Institute reported on 13 August 2026 that Europe significantly increased Ukraine aid allocations in May and June 2026 through the Ukraine Support Loan, while U.S. weapons remained important to European military support packages.

Tracker definitions distinguish commitments, allocations and deliveries; use its categories rather than one blended aid number.

The Bank of England July 2026 Monetary Policy Report kept Bank Rate at 3.75%, described volatile and higher energy prices after the Middle East shock, and warned that the pass-through to inflation remained uncertain.

Use as a central-bank scenario and policy source; distinguish direct energy-price shocks from Ukraine-aid budget debates.

The ICO says individuals must receive clear privacy information about purposes, retention periods, sharing and rights at the time personal data is collected, with regular review and updates when uses change.

Guidance notes that some UK guidance is under review after recent legislative changes; verify again before launch.

The ICO explains that cookies and similar storage technologies generally require clear information and active consent unless they are strictly necessary to provide a requested online service.

UK PECR/UK GDPR guidance; cookie rules vary by jurisdiction and by the exact technology used.

The FTC advises businesses to build security into decisions, avoid collecting unnecessary personal information, keep data only while there is a legitimate need, restrict access and dispose of unneeded information securely.

Use as security-practice guidance; legal text still needs review for the site operator and audience.

The IFCN Code of Principles commitments say fact-checking organizations should provide source detail that lets readers replicate work where safe, provide easy means to communicate with the editorial team, encourage users to send claims to check with clear expectations, and publish an open corrections policy.

Use as standards guidance for evidence and corrections workflows; the site still needs its own operational policy and staffing details.

IPSO says the latest Editors’ Code of Practice came into effect on 1 January 2025 and requires care over accuracy, prompt correction of significant inaccuracies with due prominence, privacy protection, and in-house procedures to resolve complaints swiftly.

UK press-regulation code; useful as a concrete standard but not the only applicable editorial framework.

RFC 9116 defines security.txt as a machine-readable way for organizations to publish vulnerability-disclosure contact methods, including required Contact fields and optional policy, encryption and preferred-language fields.

Technical disclosure format; operational security and legal review are still required before accepting sensitive submissions.

WCAG 2.2 is a W3C Recommendation for making web content more accessible across disabilities and devices, including testable success criteria relevant to forms, navigation, help and input assistance.

Use as a standards baseline; individual controls must still be tested in the implemented interface.

In July 2026, HRMMU verified at least 437 civilians killed and 2,610 injured in Ukraine; the actual number is likely higher.

OHCHR reports verified civilian casualties; actual figures are likely higher because verification access is limited in some areas, especially occupied territory.

On 5 August 2026, HRMMU said Ukrainian authorities reported at least 17 civilians killed and 44 injured during the 4-5 August attack on Kyiv city and region.

The article cites Ukrainian-authority figures and says HRMMU would visit impact sites and collect information to verify the casualty number and related harm.

On 22 August 2026, HRMMU reported at least 16 civilians killed and 128 injured in the 21 August Kryvyi Rih shopping-centre attack, and noted at least 16 civilians killed and 40 injured in Kyiv city and region on 19-20 August.

The shopping-centre source includes HRMMU site observations and interviews, but the numeric totals are still framed as Ukrainian-authority figures at publication time.

On 29 August 2026, HRMMU said Ukrainian authorities reported at least 37 people killed and dozens injured after explosions at a warehouse in Myla on 28 August, while HRMMU was still verifying the circumstances and the status of those killed and injured.

HRMMU was gathering information to establish circumstances, details and the status of those killed and injured.

OCHA's Ukraine Humanitarian Overview 2026 shows 10.8 million people in need, 4.1 million people prioritized, and 3.6 million planned reach for the 2026 response.

This is a live dashboard; cite the accessed date and check again before publication or external reuse.

IAEA reported on 20 August 2026 that ZNPP lost all external power after recent military activity, emergency diesel generators automatically started, seven were operating, and the plant reported more than ten days of diesel fuel available on site.

IAEA reporting reflects information available to its team and may include information provided by plant representatives.

UNICEF reported on 20 July 2026 that two children were killed and at least 50 injured in attacks across Ukraine during the previous week, that June 2026 recorded 7 children killed and 116 injured, and that a UNICEF-contracted warehouse containing more than 106,000 relief items was severely damaged.

Some casualty figures are reported figures and should be distinguished from UN-verified monthly totals where applicable.

WHO reported on 8 May 2026 that it had verified more than 3,000 attacks on health care in Ukraine since the full-scale invasion; in 2026 alone, 186 verified attacks had caused 15 deaths and at least 81 injuries at the time of publication.

Use WHO verification categories and publication date; later attacks may not be included in this count.

OHCHR reported that in July 2026 HRMMU verified at least 437 civilians killed and 2,610 injured in Ukraine; in the first seven months of 2026, HRMMU verified 12,477 civilian casualties in Ukraine; since 24 February 2022, OHCHR verified at least 16,874 civilians killed and 51,273 injured. The same release says Russian authorities reported 79 civilians killed and 601 injured in the Russian Federation in July, which HRMMU could not independently verify.

Ukraine figures are OHCHR verified minimums. Russian Federation figures are reported by Russian authorities and explicitly not independently verified by HRMMU due to lack of access and limited information.

Mediazona, BBC News Russian and volunteer researchers maintain a named list of Russian military deaths from publicly verifiable sources; the August 14, 2026 update reported 239,350 confirmed deaths and 7,533 confirmed officer deaths, while warning that the list is not exhaustive and recent months are incomplete.

Use as an independently compiled minimum and methodology source. Avoid presenting it as an official Russian state total or as a complete accounting of all military losses.

CSIS estimated that between February 2022 and June 2026 Russian forces suffered about 1.4 million battlefield casualties, including 400,000 to 450,000 fatalities, while Ukrainian forces suffered about 525,000 to 625,000 casualties, including 125,000 to 150,000 fatalities; CSIS said combined Russian and Ukrainian casualties exceeded 2 million.

Use as a research estimate, not a verified list. Keep it separate from OHCHR civilian casualty figures and Mediazona named-death counts.

Що показують поточні джерела

Перевірені цифри не дорівнюють повному масштабу шкоди

Кожне велике число має мати дату оцінки

Панелі джерел мають пояснювати, чого джерело не доводить

Розділи

Зв'язок твердження з джерелом

Ключові висновки

Дата публікації

Ключові висновки

Дата доступу

Ключові висновки

Тип джерела

Ключові висновки

Рівень упевненості

Ключові висновки

Обмеження

Ключові висновки

Архівне посилання

Ключові висновки

Історія виправлень

Ключові висновки

Web radar scan website registry

Source database

Placeholder statistic for defence and security budget share.

Placeholder statistic for a peak central-bank interest rate.

Placeholder statistic for liquid sovereign-fund assets relative to GDP.

Placeholder source for nuclear-infrastructure risk pathways.

In June 2026, HRMMU verified at least 293 civilians killed and 1,990 injured in Ukraine; the actual number is likely higher.

OHCHR reported sustained attacks on Ukraine energy infrastructure during winter 2025-2026 and documented 1,272 civilians killed and 6,871 injured from 1 December 2025 to 31 May 2026.

RDNA5 estimated Ukraine recovery and reconstruction needs at almost USD 588 billion over the next decade as of 31 December 2025.

The 2026 Ukraine Humanitarian Needs and Response Plan estimated 10.8 million people would require humanitarian assistance and requested USD 2.3 billion to assist 4.1 million of the most vulnerable people.

IOM reported that as of December 2025 about 3.7 million people remained internally displaced in Ukraine and 4.41 million had returned.

UNHCR reported 10.8 million people inside Ukraine needing humanitarian assistance in 2026 and 3.7 million internally displaced after the 2025-2026 winter.

In May 2025, the IAEA reported that Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant was relying on a single power line for essential nuclear safety and security functions, compared with ten before the conflict.

In June 2025, the IAEA reported that cooling-water and off-site power challenges would need to be fully resolved before any ZNPP reactors could be restarted.

The IAEA Director General outlined five principles to prevent a nuclear accident at Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant to the UN Security Council in May 2023.

IMF analysis found that defense-spending booms can raise inflation and fiscal pressure, with wartime booms especially costly and social spending vulnerable to crowd-out.

IMF Ukraine program documents projected 2026 growth at about 1.8 to 2.5 percent, inflation around 7.5 percent and a fiscal deficit excluding grants above 19 percent of GDP under continued war assumptions.

UN Charter Article 33 lists negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, regional arrangements and other peaceful means as dispute-settlement routes.

ICRC explains that parties to armed conflict must allow and facilitate rapid and unimpeded passage of humanitarian relief for civilians in need, subject to control rights.

OSCE Forum for Security Co-operation Decision No. 5/99 adopted the OSCE Communications Network Document, providing an institutional precedent for secure communications linked to arms-control and military notifications.

Placeholder source record for any future military casualty figures.

HRMMU reported that 2025 was the deadliest year for civilians in Ukraine since 2022, verifying 2,514 civilians killed and 12,142 injured in 2025.

WHO estimated that 4.1 million people in Ukraine would require health assistance in 2026 and that an estimated 10 million people were affected by a mental health crisis.

WHO reported that attacks on Ukraine health care increased by nearly 20 percent in 2025 and that access to rehabilitation and assistive technologies remained severely limited.

WHO reported that more than 6,400 Ukrainians had received treatment abroad through medical evacuations since the start of the full-scale invasion, including patients needing trauma, burn, rehabilitation and prosthetic care.

UNICEF reported that more than one third of Ukraine’s children, 2,589,900 children, remained displaced four years into the war.

UNICEF reported 89 UN-verified child casualties in Ukraine in March 2026 and at least 3,452 children killed or injured since February 2022, while noting true figures are likely higher.

UNICEF describes a safe, voluntary, dignified and individually assessed framework for the return and reintegration of Ukrainian children.

ICRC reported that thousands of families across Ukraine endure uncertainty about missing or captured loved ones and described psychosocial support for families of the missing.

IOM’s May 2026 veterans reintegration brief found that veterans’ economic and social reintegration can move in different directions and highlighted compounded vulnerabilities among displaced veterans and veterans with disabilities.

Mediazona, BBC News Russian and volunteers maintain a named list of Russian military deaths in Ukraine using publicly verifiable sources; by 31 July 2026, Mediazona reported 7,465 confirmed officer deaths and stressed that recent data remain incomplete.

ICRC reported that hostilities in and around Russia’s Kursk region caused thousands of families to leave their homes, left many displaced or searching for loved ones, and that ICRC helped 104 vulnerable Russian civilians return from Sumy to Russia via Belarus in late 2024 and March 2025.

ICRC reported that as of April 2026 it had visited more than 8,900 POWs on both sides, did not have full access to all POWs, and had provided 17,000 families with news of loved ones since February 2022.

Human Rights Watch reported that in the fourth year of the full-scale war, Russian authorities escalated repression against critics, expanded censorship and surveillance, and continued policies that censor criticism of the war.

Amnesty International reported that Russian authorities use centrally controlled curricula, textbooks and surveillance of students to justify the war and suppress independent thinking in schools across Russia and Russian-occupied Ukraine.

Russia’s Social Fund reported that rehabilitation centres recorded health improvements among 98% of participating demobilized SVO veterans in 2026 and described psychoemotional rehabilitation support.

ICRC reported that its president visited the Russian Federation in July 2026 to discuss protection of civilians and civilian objects, access to prisoners of war and humanitarian outcomes through neutral intermediary work.

UK Home Office statistics reported 14,725 out-of-country Ukraine Scheme visa grants in the year ending March 2026, 286,143 total grants since March 2022, 140,191 in-country extensions in the year ending March 2026, and that children made up 26% of arrivals under the Ukraine schemes.

The UK government factsheet reported 237,200 Ukrainian arrivals in the UK, including 177,600 through Homes for Ukraine, and 147,186 Ukraine Permission Extension grants as of 31 March 2026.

UK guidance states that eligible Ukrainians and family members on Ukraine schemes can apply under the Ukraine Permission Extension scheme, with permission to work, study, rent and receive public funds; second UPE grants can extend permission by 24 months.

FCDO travel advice warns against travel to large parts of Ukraine, says British nationals fighting in Ukraine have been killed or captured, and notes the UK government’s ability to assist in such circumstances is very limited.

Placeholder source record for any future casualty totals involving British, American, EU or other foreign volunteers in Ukraine.

GAO reported that from May 2022 through September 2024 DHS granted supporter-based humanitarian parole to about 774,000 beneficiaries across three processes, with 30% through Uniting for Ukraine, and that DHS later suspended or terminated these processes after fraud-risk concerns.

DHS extended Temporary Protected Status for Ukraine from 20 April 2025 through 19 October 2026 and said approximately 103,700 current beneficiaries could re-register.

The U.S. Department of State advises U.S. citizens not to travel to Ukraine because of Russia’s war, missile and drone attacks, active combat areas and limits on embassy assistance.

U.S. State Department guidance warns that children in crises may be temporarily separated from family, may not be eligible for adoption, and that Ukraine authorities were not approving children for temporary hosting at that time.

The U.S. Foreign Affairs Manual states that humanitarian assistance should save lives, alleviate suffering, provide protection and be grounded in humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence.

Eurostat reported 4.37 million non-EU citizens who fled Ukraine under temporary protection in the EU on 30 April 2026; adult women were 43.4%, adult men 26.7%, and minors 29.9% of beneficiaries.

The Council of the EU agreed on 15 July 2026 to extend temporary protection for people fleeing Ukraine until 4 March 2028; as of 31 May 2026 it cited 4.38 million people under temporary protection in the EU.

The European Commission reported over €1.4 billion allocated for humanitarian aid programmes in Ukraine, over 159,000 tonnes of in-kind assistance delivered via the EU Civil Protection Mechanism, and EU temporary protection for over four million people from Ukraine.

KSE Institute estimated Ukraine economy losses at USD 1.7 trillion in lost revenue and USD 0.6 trillion in lost value added by the end of 2026, with major losses concentrated in trade, industry, construction, services, agriculture, energy and transport.

The Kyiv Independent reported, citing a European Commission presentation it had seen, that Ukraine faced a EUR 19.6 billion defence funding gap in 2026 even after committed support and the expected EU Ukraine Support Loan component.

SIPRI reported that Russia’s federal budget funding of the war and other military spending reached about 16 trillion roubles in 2025, or 7.5 percent of GDP, and that planned 2026 military expenditure was 14.9 trillion roubles, or 6.3 percent of GDP, with amendment risk.

Meduza reported that Russia’s January-May 2026 federal deficit reached 6.01 trillion roubles, spending on national defence and security accounted for nearly 40 percent of approved expenditures, and the economy’s structural problems were deepening under war spending.

Reuters reported that Russia’s 2026 federal spending and deficit could exceed official plans by more than 1 trillion roubles, with projected spending at 45.11 trillion roubles and an implied deficit of 4.83 trillion roubles.

The UK government factsheet updated 24 July 2026 said the UK had committed GBP 25 billion for Ukraine, including GBP 16 billion in military support, up to GBP 5.6 billion in non-military support and a GBP 3.5 billion export-finance cover limit.

The House of Commons Library reported that UK bilateral aid to Ukraine rose from GBP 204 million from 2010 before the full-scale invasion to GBP 342 million in 2022, GBP 250 million in 2023 and GBP 270 million in 2024, and that FCDO bilateral spending would be GBP 240 million a year from 2026/27.

The House of Commons Library reported in February 2026 that the UK had pledged GBP 21.8 billion in support to Ukraine, with total military financing at GBP 13.06 billion, including gifted military assistance and the GBP 2.26 billion ERA loan.

CFR summarized U.S. Ukraine-related spending through March 31, 2026 and noted no significant U.S. aid legislation since 2024 while European aid increased.